Time commitment to |
Part-time |
64 |
52 |
116 |
Full-time |
24 |
5 ~ |
29 | |
Number of children |
1 |
- |
16 |
- |
2 |
- |
17 |
- | |
3 |
- |
12 |
- | |
4 or more |
- |
12 |
- | |
Age of youngest (data available for |
Under 4 |
- |
1 |
- |
- |
9 |
- | ||
5 |
- |
11 |
- | |
6 |
- |
8 |
- | |
~∏ |
- |
10 |
- | |
8 |
- |
7 |
- | |
9 |
- |
4 |
- | |
Ю |
- |
1 |
- | |
11 |
- |
4 |
- | |
Unknown |
- |
1 |
- | |
Totals |
88 |
57 |
145 |
Socio-economic characteristics were identified by self-reported labour market status,
and for those who were working, social class. Although labour market status is used
as an indicator of SES for purposes of describing sample characteristics, non-
occupational dimensions of social class such as tenure, access to cultural resources
and wealth also emerged through the biographical interviews.
Forty-four per cent of our sample were currently employed. The remaining 56% not in
the labour market could be divided into four groups: housewives and househusbands;
students; the retired; and the unemployed. Diagram 1 (p. 88) shows the breakdown of
the non-labour market group. As can be seen in the diagram, those classifying
themselves as students were a large proportion of the non-labour market sample.
87