Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index



able than to be able to provide a second order approximation (rather than a
first order only as is that case with
Pl).

Ad. 4: As there are quite a few equally “superlative” indices it seems
desirable to make an “informed” choice among these index formulas. In this
respect it is often believed that all superlative indices approximate each other
sufficiently close because Diewert has shown that “all the superlative index
formulae . . . approximate each other to the second order around any point
where the two price vectors . .. are equal and where the two quantity vectors
. .. are equal” ([14]Diewert (2000), p. 61). This result is generally understood
as justifying the view that it does not matter much which superlative index
is taken as they will display a similar order of magnitude for whichever data.
The problem, however, is that the “equal (or proportional) price and quantity
point” ([14]Diewert (2000), p.65) where
pt = Ap0 and qt = Aq0 respectively36
is relatively uninteresting. This is so because in that case all reasonable
indices will be identically
A anyway. Moreover [20]Hill (2006) found out that
the approximation theorem referring to the quadratic mean of order
r (which
is a flexible functional form for all values of
r), does not apply to extreme
values of
r. It works well in the range 0 r2 but it can yield with a
skewed distribution of price relatives and
r → ∞ differences between Pr
and
Prwhich may be much greater than the difference PlPp. So Hill
concluded that “the economic approach does not by itself solve the index
number problem, since it does not tell us which superlative index should be
used”.

In summary we may conclude that the COLI-theory in general and the
SIA (built on this theoretical foundation) in particular need a number of
quite restrictive assumptions so that in “the perennial question of the realism
of the theory’s assumptions” ([27]Triplett (2001), p. 318)
in our view the
COLI may well come out at the losing end compared to the COGI. There are
also other aspects we could not deal with here, that may cast doubt on the
general belief of COLI advocates, that the Laspeyres index falls far behind
the Fisher index for example. The superlative quantity index for example
plays a somewhat dubious role. When
Qζt1 is superlative this means that
the standard of living (level of utility) increased because
Q^t approximates
ut∕u0 = f (qt) /f (q0). On the other hand P^t measures the minimum cost of
maintaining a constant level of utility.37 The relevance (representativity) of it

36The “equal” point is of course the case λ = 1.

37It is the word “minimum” which Triplett seems to have forgotten when he levies the

20



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
4. The name is absent
5. Searching Threshold Inflation for India
6. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model
7. Fertility in Developing Countries
8. Towards a Strategy for Improving Agricultural Inputs Markets in Africa
9. Public Debt Management in Brazil
10. The name is absent
11. Spatial Aggregation and Weather Risk Management
12. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
13. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
14. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?
15. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
16. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
20. The name is absent