dependent on restrictive and perhaps unrealistic assumptions than the much
simpler COGI approach.
References
[1] A. G. Alley, D. G. Ferguson, and K. G. Stewart. An almost
ideal demand system for alcoholic beverages in british columbia. Em-
pirical Economics 17, 401 - 418 (1992).
[2] J. Banks, R. W. Blundell, and A. Lewbel. Quadratic engel
curves, indirect tax reform and welfare measurement. Review of Eco-
nomics and Statistics 79, 527-539 (1997).
[3] W. A. BARNETT. Definitions of ’’second order approximation” and of
’’flexible functional form”. Economics Letters 12, 31 - 35 (1983).
[4] W. A. BARNETT. The recent reappearance of the homotheticity re-
striction on preferences. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics
1, 215 - 218 (1983).
[5] W. A. BARNETT and K.-H. Choi. Operational identification of the
complete class of superlative index numbers: an application of galois
theory. Journal of Mathematical Economics 44, 603-612 (2008).
[6] W. A. Barnett, K.-H. Choi, and T. M. Sinclair. Thedifferential
approach to superlative index number theory. Journal of Agricultural
and Applied Economics 35, 59-64 (2003).
[7] W. A. BARNETT and Y. W. Lee. The global properties of the min-
flex laurent, generalized leontief, and translog flexible functional forms.
Econometrica 53, 1421 - 1437 (1985).
[8] R. Blundell, P. Pashardes, and G. Weber. What do we learn
about consumer demand patterns from micro data? American Economic
Review 83, 570-597 (1993).
[9] A. C. CAMERON and P. K. Trivedi. “Microeconometrics: Methods
and Application”. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005).
34