In the case of the established operator, we consider four alternative regulatory
regimes: 1) Forbearance (absence of regulation); 2) Permanent regulation; 3) Sunset
clause (regulation only in the initial period of the project, so as to incentive investment in
alternative infrastructures); 4) Regulatory holiday (absence of regulation in the initial
period of the project, when uncertainty on the returns is particularly high). The intervention
by the regulator is modelled as a decrease in the annual net cash flow of the established
operator by 27.5%. This reduction corresponds to a halving of the cost savings and the
extra profits of NGNs.
The outcomes of the simulations suggest that investment is carried out immediately
under forbearance (as expected) and regulatory holiday regimes; it is delayed by around
two years in the other cases. As far as the timing of the investment is concerned, the
regulatory holiday appears superior to the other regulatory options.
40
More intriguing information
1. Cryothermal Energy Ablation Of Cardiac Arrhythmias 2005: State Of The Art2. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
3. The name is absent
4. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
5. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?
6. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. DURABLE CONSUMPTION AS A STATUS GOOD: A STUDY OF NEOCLASSICAL CASES
10. The name is absent