The name is absent



CONTENTS

1. Introduction ............................................................. 1

1.1 About this project ......................................................... 1

1.2 About this document ...................................................... 1

2. Methods of the Systematic Rapid Evidence Assessment ................... 2

2.1 Review type .............................................................. 2

2.2 Review question .......................................................... 2

2.3 User involvement ......................................................... 2

2.4 Identifying and describing studies ............................................ 2

2.4.1 Defining relevant studies: Inclusion and exclusion criteria ...................... 2

2.4.2 Identification of potential studies: Searching and screening .................... 3

2.5 Data extraction ........................................................... 5

2.6. Quality assurance process .................................................. 5

2.7 In-depth review ........................................................... 5

2.7.1 Moving from broad characterisation (mapping) to in-depth review ............... 5

2.7.2 Detailed description of studies in the in-depth review ......................... 5

2.7.3 Assessing quality of studies and weight of evidence for the review question ....... 5

2.7.4 Synthesis of evidence on outcomes ......................................... 6

2.7.5 Synthesis of Economic Analysis ............................................. 7

2.8 In-depth review: quality assurance process .................................... 7

3. Descriptive information about studies in the map ........................ 8

4. Studies selected for the in-depth review ................................ 11

5. References for studies included in the SREA............................. 12

Appendix 1.1: Authorship of this report .................................... 15

Appendix 2.1: Details of search strategy ................................... 16

Appendix 2.2: Coding framework .......................................... 23

Appendix 2.3: Framework for assessing Weight of Evidence B .............. 43

Appendix 4: Summary of in-depth studies .................................. 44

Table 1: HCHHHU Characteristics ............................................... 44

Table 2: Services delivered and study results ..................................... 49

Table 3: Methods and Weight of Evidence ........................................ 57

Table 4: Characteristics of the coordination /
integration intervention and overall study results
......................... 59

Table 5: Summary of economic analysis ......................................... 70



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. International Financial Integration*
3. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses
4. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
5. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom
6. Multiple Arrhythmogenic Substrate for Tachycardia in a
7. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
8. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
9. DURABLE CONSUMPTION AS A STATUS GOOD: A STUDY OF NEOCLASSICAL CASES
10. Banking Supervision in Integrated Financial Markets: Implications for the EU