36 Interventions for HCHHHU: technical report
F.9 Planned sample size
If more than one group, please give details for each |
F.9.2 Explicitly stated (please specify) F.9.3 Not stated/unclear (please specify) |
F.10 Which methods are used to recruit people into the study?
e.g. letters of invitation, telephone contact, face-to- |
F.10.1 Not applicable (please specify) F.10.2 Explicitly stated (please specify) F.10.3 Implicit (please specify) F.10.4 Not stated/unclear (please specify) |
F.11 Was consent sought?
Please comment on the quality of consent if relevant |
F.11.1 Not applicable (please specify) F.11.2 Participant consent sought F.11.3 Parental consent sought F.11.4 Other consent sought F.11.5 Consent not sought F.11.6 Not stated/unclear (please specify) |
F.12 Details of data collection methods or tool(s).
Please provide details including names for all tools used |
F.12.1 Explicitly stated (please specify) F.12.2 Implicit (please specify) F.12.3 Not stated/unclear (please specify) |
F.13 Do the authors describe any ways they addressed the reliability of their
data collection tools/methods?
e.g. test - re-test methods (Where more than one tool was employed, please |
F.13.1 Details E.g. Did they look at inter-rater reliability? Or re-test a |
F.14 Do the authors describe any ways they have addressed the validity of their data collection
tools/methods?
e.g. mention previous validation of tools, published (Where more than one tool was employed, please |
F.14.1 Details |
More intriguing information
1. Categorial Grammar and Discourse2. Effort and Performance in Public-Policy Contests
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
6. The name is absent
7. Markets for Influence
8. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
9. On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions
10. Multiple Arrhythmogenic Substrate for Tachycardia in a