Nelson et al. (2000) Case study N=1 family |
First hand account of |
No |
Retrospective |
Level 1 |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Low |
Nixon et al. (2006) One group post-test only Views studies |
No |
Concerns re. reliability of |
Cross- |
Level 1 |
Low |
Low |
Medium |
Low |
Pritchard (2001) |
self-reported |
All the questionnaire-type |
Prospective |
Level 3 |
High |
Medium |
High |
Medium |
Sen and Goldbart (2005) |
Needs assessment |
"As far as possible, |
Prospective |
Level 2 |
High |
Low |
Medium |
Low |
Tischler et al. (2004) Surveys Views studies The focus of this data |
Interview schedule Interviews conducted in Participants were assured Independent researcher |
Semi-structured interview Independent researcher |
Cross- |
Level 1 |
Medium |
Low |
Medium |
Low |
58 Interventions for HCHHHU: technical report
More intriguing information
1. IMMIGRATION AND AGRICULTURAL LABOR POLICIES2. Has Competition in the Japanese Banking Sector Improved?
3. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM
4. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
5. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete
6. The purpose of this paper is to report on the 2008 inaugural Equal Opportunities Conference held at the University of East Anglia, Norwich
7. The ultimate determinants of central bank independence
8. Visual Perception of Humanoid Movement
9. The name is absent
10. Publication of Foreign Exchange Statistics by the Central Bank of Chile