[23] Maggi G. (1996), Strategic trade policies with endogenous mode of compe-
tition, The American Economic Review, 86(1), 237-258.
[24] Matsuyama, K (2000), Endogenous inequality, The Review of Economic
Studies, 67, 743-759.
[25] Matsuyama, K. (2002), Explaining diversity: symmetry-breaking in com-
plementarity games, American Economic Review, 92, 241-246.
[26] Matsuyama, K. (2004 ), Financial market globalization, symmetry-
breaking, and endogenous inequality of nations, Econometrica, 72, 853-884.
[27] Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1990), Rationalizability, learning and equi-
librium in games with strategic complementarities, Econometrica, 58(6),
1255-1277.
[28] Milgrom, P. and C. Shannon (1994), Monotone comparative statics, Econo-
metrica, 62: 157-180.
[29] Mills, D. E. and W. Smith (1996), It pays to be different: endogenous
heterogeneity of firms in an oligopoly, International Journal of Industrial
Organization, 14, 317-329.
[30] Mintz, J. and H. Tulkens (1986), Commodity tax competition between
member states of a federation: equilibrium and efficiency, Journal of Public
Economics, 29, 133-172.
[31] Motta, M. (1993), Endogenous quality choice: price vs. quality competition,
Journal of Industrial Economics, 41(1), 113-131.
[32] Murphy, K., A. Schleifer and R. Vishny (1989), Industrialization and the
big push, Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1008-1026.
[33] Nelson, R. and R. Winter (1982), An evolutionary theory of economic
change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
45
More intriguing information
1. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Announcement effects of convertible bond loans versus warrant-bond loans: An empirical analysis for the Dutch market
6. The name is absent
7. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
8. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
9. Applications of Evolutionary Economic Geography
10. CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI