Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament



Party Positions in the EP -- p10

respectively). Quite similar results may be observed for the EU Collective Security
dimension, with the PES once again emerging as the most strongly integrative, and the EDD
the most Euro-s
ceptic.

Finally, we observe in Table 1 several non-economic dimensions of policy, such as
social and moral issues, immigration and the environment. On the classic dimension of moral
liberalism (measured by attitudes toward
s abortion, homosexuality and euthanasia), we see
the EP divided into two distinct groups, one left of cent
re and one to the right. On the “left” of
the spectrum, we find the Greens, GUE, ELDR, and the PES, with mean scores ranging 4.0
-
5.6 respectively. Closest to the centre but still distinctively right of centre is the EPP with a
mean score of 13.9 (SE .58). Finally, the UEN and the EDD occupied their now familiar
positions on the right
, both with mean scores at 15.1. Very similar results were observed for
immigration, with these same sets of parties divided into two similar camps, with the EPP
once again closest to the cent
re at 12.0 (SE .70).

Finally, on the issue of the environment, party groups were generally less divided and
more centrist. The exception was the Greens on the “left”, meaning they favo
ured protecting
the environment even at the cost of economic growth, with a mean score of 2.9. Left of centre
were the GUE (6.9) and the PES (8.6), followed by the ELDR in the center at 10.9. The
remaining parties EPP, UEN, and EDD were slightly to the right of cent
re at essentially the
same positions (12.1, 12.8, and 12.9 respectively).

As measured by the Divergence column, we see that the policy dimensions where party
positions were the most dispersed - indicating the policy dimensions with the highest degrees
of policy differences between party groups - were first and foremost the classic economic and
social left
-right positions. Social policy had the highest position divergence, at 4.9, followed
by
Taxes v. Spending and Deregulation at 4.0 and 3.9 respectively. The three EU dimensions
and also immigration ranged in the middle region of divergence between 3.2 and 3.9.
Interestingly the least contested policy dimension was the environment, with a divergence
score of just 2.1.

Summarizing the positional information graphically, we can visualize the political
parties in two dimensions using a two-dimensional plot of economic left
-right versus



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
3. Correlates of Alcoholic Blackout Experience
4. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
5. The Impact of Hosting a Major Sport Event on the South African Economy
6. EU enlargement and environmental policy
7. Structural Breakpoints in Volatility in International Markets
8. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience
9. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
10. The name is absent
11. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany
12. A novel selective 11b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor prevents human adipogenesis
13. Endogenous Heterogeneity in Strategic Models: Symmetry-breaking via Strategic Substitutes and Nonconcavities
14. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
15. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
16. The East Asian banking sector—overweight?
17. The name is absent
18. Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?
19. The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning
20. Migrating Football Players, Transfer Fees and Migration Controls