21
(c) Latin America
|
Period |
Scale |
D-statistic |
Critical Values |
H0: Homogeneity | ||||
|
10% |
5% |
1% |
10% |
5% |
1% | |||
|
1997-1998 |
d1 |
0.283 |
0.108 |
0.120 |
0.144 |
F |
F |
F |
|
d2 |
0.448 |
0.151 |
0.167 |
0.202 |
F |
F |
F | |
|
d3 |
0.220 |
0.218 |
0.243 |
0.295 |
F |
T |
T | |
|
d4 |
0.539 |
0.319 |
0.355 |
0.428 |
F |
F |
F | |
|
d5 |
0.622 |
0.503 |
0.558 |
0.659 |
F |
F |
T | |
|
d6 |
0.975 |
0.993 |
0.998 |
0.999 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
1999-2001 |
d1 |
0.196 |
0.088 |
0.098 |
0.117 |
F |
F |
F |
|
d2 |
0.142 |
0.126 |
0.140 |
0.167 |
F |
F |
T | |
|
d3 |
0.201 |
0.176 |
0.195 |
0.232 |
F |
F |
T | |
|
d4 |
0.165 |
0.256 |
0.284 |
0.342 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d5 |
0.402 |
0.381 |
0.425 |
0.505 |
F |
T |
T | |
|
d6 |
0.483 |
0.636 |
0.703 |
0.815 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
1999-2002 |
d1 |
0.150 |
0.077 |
0.085 |
0.101 |
F |
F |
F |
|
d2 |
0.093 |
0.109 |
0.121 |
0.144 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d3 |
0.182 |
0.152 |
0.168 |
0.203 |
F |
F |
T | |
|
d4 |
0.140 |
0.218 |
0.243 |
0.295 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d5 |
0.294 |
0.319 |
0.355 |
0.428 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d6 |
0.277 |
0.503 |
0.558 |
0.659 |
T |
T |
T | |
(d) North America
|
Period |
Scale |
D-statistic |
Critical Values |
H0: Homogeneity | ||||
|
10% |
5% |
1% |
10% |
5% |
1% | |||
|
1997-1998 |
d1 |
0.191 |
0.108 |
0.120 |
0.144 |
F |
F |
F |
|
d2 |
0.258 |
0.151 |
0.167 |
0.202 |
F |
F |
F | |
|
d3 |
0.140 |
0.218 |
0.243 |
0.295 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d4 |
0.614 |
0.319 |
0.355 |
0.428 |
F |
F |
F | |
|
d5 |
0.275 |
0.503 |
0.558 |
0.659 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d6 |
0.996 |
0.993 |
0.998 |
0.999 |
F |
T |
T | |
|
1999-2001 |
d1 |
0.111 |
0.088 |
0.098 |
0.117 |
F |
F |
T |
|
d2 |
0.095 |
0.126 |
0.140 |
0.167 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d3 |
0.129 |
0.176 |
0.195 |
0.232 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d4 |
0.136 |
0.256 |
0.284 |
0.342 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d5 |
0.188 |
0.381 |
0.425 |
0.505 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d6 |
0.714 |
0.636 |
0.703 |
0.815 |
F |
F |
T | |
|
1999-2002 |
d1 |
0.158 |
0.077 |
0.085 |
0.101 |
F |
F |
F |
|
d2 |
0.111 |
0.109 |
0.121 |
0.144 |
F |
T |
T | |
|
d3 |
0.170 |
0.152 |
0.168 |
0.203 |
F |
F |
T | |
|
d4 |
0.153 |
0.218 |
0.243 |
0.295 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d5 |
0.127 |
0.319 |
0.355 |
0.428 |
T |
T |
T | |
|
d6 |
0.363 |
0.503 |
0.558 |
0.659 |
T |
T |
T | |
Note: An Inclan-Tiao approximation is used to compute the critical values for sample sizes N≥128, while a
Monte Carlo Technique is used for N<128. “T” indicates that we cannot reject the null hypothesis and “F”
otherwise.
More intriguing information
1. Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program2. Large Scale Studies in den deutschen Sozialwissenschaften:Stand und Perspektiven. Bericht über einen Workshop der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft
3. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
4. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
5. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
6. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
7. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
8. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
9. The name is absent
10. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle