Table 1
Cronbach’s alpha scores for each subscale
|
Subscales |
Numbers of |
Cronbach’s Alpha_____ |
Inter-item |
|
Enjoyment |
9 |
.85 |
.57 |
|
Confidence |
8 |
.76 |
.44 |
|
Usefulness |
10 |
.83 |
.52 |
|
Support |
7 |
.78 |
.49 |
Table 2
One-Way ANOVA test for groups of pupils based on teachers’ background
|
Enjoyment |
df 2 417 |
F |
Sig. |
|
Confidence |
2 417 |
3.998 |
.019 |
|
Usefulness |
2 417 |
4.315 |
.014 |
|
Support |
2 417 |
21.585 |
.000 |
Table 3
/-tests results for low and high confidence pupils
|
t |
df S |
⅛. (2-tailed) | |
|
Enjoyment |
-12.939 |
281.591 |
.000 |
|
Usefulness |
-10.849 |
331.993 |
.000 |
|
Support |
-4.884 |
371.289 |
.000 |
24
More intriguing information
1. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption2. Segmentación en la era de la globalización: ¿Cómo encontrar un segmento nuevo de mercado?
3. Fiscal federalism and Fiscal Autonomy: Lessons for the UK from other Industrialised Countries
4. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD
5. Stillbirth in a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital in North Bengal - A Review of Causes, Risk Factors and Prevention Strategies
6. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
7. The name is absent
8. sycnoιogιcaι spaces
9. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
10. The name is absent