A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads



Table 4

Regressions of Changes in Absolute Yield Spreads of SCM Long-Term
Corporate Bond Indices on Changes in Government of Canada Yields -
AR-GARCH Estimation

Table 4 reports the results of the AR-GARCH estimation of regression model (3) in
which the dependent variable is the monthly change in the absolute yield spread. This
regression model is of the following form:

S' = β0 + β δ YT-bill + β2sloPe + ε,
where S is the monthly change in the absolute yield spread, Yτ-buι is the monthly
change in the three-month Treasury Bill yield, and
Slope is the monthly change in the
spread between the constant maturity long-term Government of Canada index and the
three-month Treasury bill yield.
t-values are in parentheses, m gives the degree of the
autoregressive process as determined by the stepwise autoregression method,
p and q
are the GARCH(p, q ) parameters, Norm. Test gives the p-value for the normality test
for detecting misspecification of the GARCH model, and finally LM gives the
p-value
for the Lagrange multiplier test. Panel A reports the estimates for the entire sample,
covering the 08:1976-07:2001 25-year period. Data during this sample period are
dominated by corporate bonds carrying a standard call provision. Panel B outlines the
results for the 01:1995-07:2001 sub-period, in which bonds carrying the doomsday call
are expected to dominate all indices.

____________________________Panel A: 09:1976-07:2001_________________________

_________Regression Coefficients

AR and GARCH Parameters_______________

Index

β 0

β1

β 2

m

P

q

Norm. Test

R2

LM

AAA

-0.0027

(-0.51)

-0.0442

(-2.51)

-0.0806

(-4.25)

1, 2, 4

1

1

<0.0001

0.19

<0.0001

AA

-0.0074

(-1.82)

-0.1231

(-8.72)

-0.1893

(-12.56)

1, 2, 4

1

1

0.0005

0.18

<0.0001

A

-0.0063

(-1.13)

-0.1011

(-6.22)

-0.1514

(-8.16)

1, 2

1

1

0.0001

0.16

<0.0001

BBB

0.0025
(0.18)

-0.1244

(-3.26)

-0.1996

(-4.72)

-

1

1

<0.0001

0.09

-

Panel B

: 01:1995-07:2001__________

Regression Coefficients

AR and GARCH Parameters

Goodness of Fit

Index

β 0

β1

β β2

m

P

q

Norm. Test

R2

LM

AAA

N/A

AA

-0.0076

(-0.48)

-0.1732

(-2.34)

-0.1751

(-2.44)

-

-

-

-

0.08

-

A

-0.0016

(-0.11)

-0.1519

(-2.17)

-0.1645

(-2.42)

-

-

-

-

0.08

-

BBB

-0.0037

(-0.15)

0.1361

(1.21)

0.0947
(0.87)

-

-

-

-

0.02

-

38



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
3. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
4. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
5. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
6. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
7. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
8. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
9. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
10. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
11. Testing Hypotheses in an I(2) Model with Applications to the Persistent Long Swings in the Dmk/$ Rate
12. The name is absent
13. sycnoιogιcaι spaces
14. The Social Context as a Determinant of Teacher Motivational Strategies in Physical Education
15. The name is absent
16. On the job rotation problem
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Fertility in Developing Countries
20. The name is absent