Table 6
Regressions of Changes in Absolute Nominal Yield Spreads of SCM Long-Term Corporate
Bond Indices on Changes in the Real Yield of the Constant Maturity Long-Term Government
of Canada Index and on Changes in the Monthly Inflation Rate
Table 6 reports the results of the AR-GARCH estimation of regression model (5). This regression
model is of the following form:
δs = β0 + β,'∖lnf + β2∖ YLT + ε,
where ∆S is the monthly change in the nominal yield spread, ∆Ylt is the monthly change in the real
yield on the constant maturity long-term Government of Canada index, ∆Inf is the monthly change
in the inflation rate. t-values are in parentheses, m gives the degree of the autoregressive process as
determined by the stepwise autoregression method, p and q are the GARCH(p,q) parameters, Norm.
Test gives the p-value for the normality test for detecting misspecification of the GARCH model,
and finally LM gives the p-value for the Lagrange multiplier test. Panel A reports the estimates for
the entire sample, covering the 08:1976-07:2001 25-year period. Data during this sample period are
dominated by corporate bonds carrying a standard call provision. Panel B outlines the results for the
01:1995-07:2001 sub-period, in which bonds carrying the doomsday call are expected to dominate
all indices.
Panel A: |
09:1976-07:2001 | ||||||||
Regression Coefficient_______ |
AR and GARCH Parameters | ||||||||
Index |
β 0 |
β1 |
β 2 |
m |
P |
q |
Norm. Test |
R2 |
LM |
AAA |
-0.0012 (-0.15) |
-0.2232 (-8.02) |
-0.1801 (-8.47) |
1,4 |
1 |
1 |
<0.0001 |
0.14 |
<.0001 |
AA |
-0.0036 (-0.8) |
-0.1542 (-6.74) |
-0.1350 (-9.03) |
1, 2, 4 |
1 |
1 |
<0.0001 |
0.16 |
<.0001 |
A |
-0.0049 (-0.82) |
-0.1527 (-5.99) |
-0.1204 (-7.11) |
1, 2 |
1 |
1 |
0.0003 |
0.14 |
<0.0001 |
BBB |
0.0018 |
-0.1822 (-3.22) |
-0.1454 (-3.83) |
- |
1 |
1 |
<0.0001 |
0.07 |
- |
Panel B: |
01:1995-07:2001 | ||||||||
Regression Coefficients |
______AR and GARCH Parameters______ |
Goodness of Fit | |||||||
Index |
β 0 |
β1 |
β 2 |
m |
P |
q |
Norm. Test |
R2 |
LM |
AAA |
N/A | ||||||||
AA |
-0.0079 (-0.5) |
-0.2082 (-2.33) |
-0.1778 (-2.62) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.08 |
- |
A |
-0.0021 (-0.14) |
-0.1916 (-2.27) |
-0.1629 (-2.53) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.08 |
- |
BBB |
-0.0045 (-0.19) |
0.1266 |
0.1143 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.16 |
- |
40
More intriguing information
1. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment2. LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
6. The name is absent
7. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
8. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
9. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
10. AN EXPLORATION OF THE NEED FOR AND COST OF SELECTED TRADE FACILITATION MEASURES IN ASIA AND THE PACIFIC IN THE CONTEXT OF THE WTO NEGOTIATIONS