-39-
Table 1. Change in external assets and liabilities, cumulative capital flows, and capital gains,
1995-2000 (ratios of 2000 GDP)
|
(1) Change in |
(2) Cumul. cap. |
(3) = (1)-(2) Impact of |
(4) Change in |
(5) |
(6)=(4)-(5) Impact of | |
|
with FDI at book value | ||||||
|
United States |
27.8 |
23.8 |
4.0 |
36.4 |
34.8 |
1.6 |
|
United Kingd. |
144.1 |
145.2 |
-1.2 |
145.5 |
149.0 |
-3.5 |
|
Austria |
53.7 |
70.9 |
-17.2 |
57.9 |
84.8 |
-26.9 |
|
Denmark |
76.1 |
84.2 |
-8.1 |
60.0 |
85.3 |
-25.3 |
|
France |
51.1 |
68.4 |
-17.3 |
64.3 |
55.1 |
9.1 |
|
Germany |
49.9 |
72.2 |
-22.3 |
53.6 |
74.9 |
-21.4 |
|
Italy |
50.1 |
56.4 |
-6.3 |
40.9 |
52.5 |
-11.7 |
|
Norway |
76.8 |
79.5 |
-2.7 |
59.2 |
61.4 |
-2.2 |
|
Sweden |
69.5 |
43.0 |
26.5 |
57.4 |
38.1 |
19.3 |
|
Switzerland |
208.9 |
256.3 |
-47.4 |
208.1 |
201.4 |
6.7 |
|
Canada |
31.1 |
37.6 |
-6.5 |
16.7 |
32.1 |
-15.4 |
|
Japan |
7.1 |
4.0 |
3.1 |
-0.1 |
-7.4 |
7.3 |
|
Finland |
74.3 |
99.6 |
-25.3 |
180.4 |
76.9 |
103.5 |
|
Iceland |
31.9 |
33.5 |
-1.7 |
53.1 |
66.0 |
-12.9 |
|
Portugal |
51.3 |
56.5 |
-5.2 |
83.8 |
85.9 |
-2.0 |
|
Spain |
52.6 |
64.8 |
-12.2 |
51.6 |
69.2 |
-17.6 |
|
with FDI at market value | ||||||
|
United States |
34.6 |
23.1 |
11.6 |
47.2 |
37.4 |
9.9 |
|
France |
80.5 |
68.4 |
12.1 |
70.3 |
55.1 |
15.2 |
|
Netherlands |
135.4 |
100.0 |
35.3 |
163.7 |
88.3 |
75.4 |
|
Sweden |
130.1 |
43.0 |
87.1 |
97.0 |
38.1 |
58.9 |
|
Australia |
19.7 |
17.4 |
2.3 |
22.0 |
39.0 |
-16.9 |
Note: the change in external assets (liabilities) is the difference in gross external assets (liabilities)
between end-2000 and end-1995 (end-1996 for Portugal), as ratio of 2000 GDP. The impact of capital
gains is the difference between the change in external assets (liabilities) and cumulative capital
outflows (inflows) between 1996 and 2000 (1997-2000 for Portugal), also as ratio of 2000 GDP.
More intriguing information
1. Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors2. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
3. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent