-39-
Table 1. Change in external assets and liabilities, cumulative capital flows, and capital gains,
1995-2000 (ratios of 2000 GDP)
|
(1) Change in |
(2) Cumul. cap. |
(3) = (1)-(2) Impact of |
(4) Change in |
(5) |
(6)=(4)-(5) Impact of | |
|
with FDI at book value | ||||||
|
United States |
27.8 |
23.8 |
4.0 |
36.4 |
34.8 |
1.6 |
|
United Kingd. |
144.1 |
145.2 |
-1.2 |
145.5 |
149.0 |
-3.5 |
|
Austria |
53.7 |
70.9 |
-17.2 |
57.9 |
84.8 |
-26.9 |
|
Denmark |
76.1 |
84.2 |
-8.1 |
60.0 |
85.3 |
-25.3 |
|
France |
51.1 |
68.4 |
-17.3 |
64.3 |
55.1 |
9.1 |
|
Germany |
49.9 |
72.2 |
-22.3 |
53.6 |
74.9 |
-21.4 |
|
Italy |
50.1 |
56.4 |
-6.3 |
40.9 |
52.5 |
-11.7 |
|
Norway |
76.8 |
79.5 |
-2.7 |
59.2 |
61.4 |
-2.2 |
|
Sweden |
69.5 |
43.0 |
26.5 |
57.4 |
38.1 |
19.3 |
|
Switzerland |
208.9 |
256.3 |
-47.4 |
208.1 |
201.4 |
6.7 |
|
Canada |
31.1 |
37.6 |
-6.5 |
16.7 |
32.1 |
-15.4 |
|
Japan |
7.1 |
4.0 |
3.1 |
-0.1 |
-7.4 |
7.3 |
|
Finland |
74.3 |
99.6 |
-25.3 |
180.4 |
76.9 |
103.5 |
|
Iceland |
31.9 |
33.5 |
-1.7 |
53.1 |
66.0 |
-12.9 |
|
Portugal |
51.3 |
56.5 |
-5.2 |
83.8 |
85.9 |
-2.0 |
|
Spain |
52.6 |
64.8 |
-12.2 |
51.6 |
69.2 |
-17.6 |
|
with FDI at market value | ||||||
|
United States |
34.6 |
23.1 |
11.6 |
47.2 |
37.4 |
9.9 |
|
France |
80.5 |
68.4 |
12.1 |
70.3 |
55.1 |
15.2 |
|
Netherlands |
135.4 |
100.0 |
35.3 |
163.7 |
88.3 |
75.4 |
|
Sweden |
130.1 |
43.0 |
87.1 |
97.0 |
38.1 |
58.9 |
|
Australia |
19.7 |
17.4 |
2.3 |
22.0 |
39.0 |
-16.9 |
Note: the change in external assets (liabilities) is the difference in gross external assets (liabilities)
between end-2000 and end-1995 (end-1996 for Portugal), as ratio of 2000 GDP. The impact of capital
gains is the difference between the change in external assets (liabilities) and cumulative capital
outflows (inflows) between 1996 and 2000 (1997-2000 for Portugal), also as ratio of 2000 GDP.
More intriguing information
1. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE2. The name is absent
3. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
4. Wirkt eine Preisregulierung nur auf den Preis?: Anmerkungen zu den Wirkungen einer Preisregulierung auf das Werbevolumen
5. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
6. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks
10. FASTER TRAINING IN NONLINEAR ICA USING MISEP