International Financial Integration*



-40 -

Table 2 Panel Analysis of International Financial Integration, 1982-2001

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

External

Liberalization

0.29

(5.3)***

0.06

(.69)

0.04

(.5)

-0.05
(.5)

-0.06
(.6)

0.08

(.8)

0.05

(.5)

Trade openness

4.18

(3.2)***

4.95

(3.7)***

3.08

(3.71)***

3.89

(4.5)***

3.29

(3.63)***

2.72

(3.01)***

Log GDP per
capita

2.65

(2.5)**

1.56

(1.97)*

2.76

(3.51)***

2.82

(4.31)***

2.71

(4.06)***

Financial Depth

0.24

(1.58)

0.56

(1.68)

0.62

(1.88)*

0.75

(2.37)**

Stock market
capitalization

1.27

(5.86)***

1.3

(6.18)***

1.32

(6.35)***

1.35

(6.95)***

Cumulative
privatization

-1.65

(.66)

-9.67

(2.66)**

-9.92

(2.87)***

Corporate Tax
Rate

-1.47

(1.65)

-1.27

(1.4)

Protection

0.19

(1.4)

Adjusted R2

0.17

0.35

0.39

0.69

0.72

0.7

0.7

Number of obs.

78

78

78

72

64

49

49

Note: Dependent variable is first difference of the IFIGFP ratio. Fixed-effects panel
estimation using averaged data for 1982-85, 1986-89, 1990-93, 1994-97, 1998-2001. White-
corrected t-statistics in parentheses. See text for definition of variables.



More intriguing information

1. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
2. Spectral density bandwith choice and prewightening in the estimation of heteroskadasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrices in panel data models
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The mental map of Dutch entrepreneurs. Changes in the subjective rating of locations in the Netherlands, 1983-1993-2003
6. Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies
7. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)
8. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
9. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS
10. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters