Multifunctionality of Agriculture: An Inquiry Into the Complementarity Between Landscape Preservation and Food Security



into a richer model. A willingness to pay function for landscape preservation and a production function
for food security are incorporated into a sector model for the agricultural sector in Norway. The model is,
in section 4, employed to discuss the optimal policy and supply of public goods when cost
complementarities are considered. Section 5 offers concluding remarks.

2. Agricultural public goods: Concepts and principles

In this section we demonstrate some basic principles on food security, landscape preservation and cost
complementarities within a simplified framework. Later, these principles are elaborated into a richer
model.

2.1 Food security

An agricultural sector that is too small may cause problems for the population if a crisis should arise.
Blockade in connection with war or international conflict is the traditional example of a crisis.
Increased risk of ecological crises and man-made disasters like the Chernobyl fall-out are perhaps
more relevant examples. The ability to provide food if a crisis arrives is referred to as (national)
food
security
. Ballenger and Mabbs-Zeno (1992) defines it more precisely as:

(1)            Pr [(production + stocks + imports + aid) ≥ needs] ≥ π,

where Pr symbolizes probability, π is the minimum acceptable likelihood and ‘needs’ is the
subsistence level. This level has to be covered either from national production or from imports and
stockpiling. In Brunstad et al. (1995a) the subsistence level is measured by a
crisis menu, defined as
the minimum annual quantities of agricultural products that must be made available for the population
when some consideration is also taken to the palatability of the diet. If it is not possible to import, this
consumption must be covered from domestic production. Stockpiling is possible for storable
commodities, but with no import possibilities stocks will soon run out. Such arguments have
traditionally been the rationale for self sufficiency or near self sufficiency in food production.

The Gulbrandsen-Lindbeck principle

Gulbrandsen and Lindbeck (1973) attacked the self sufficiency goal by stressing that production in
normal times does not have to be equal to the production during a crisis. Some switching of production
when the crisis has arisen will be possible. The crucial condition for switching of production is,
however, that the necessary factors of production are available, especially agricultural land but also
skills, animal material and capital equipment.

The following simple example clarifies the Gulbrandsen-Lindbeck principle. Assume that we
have two agricultural commodities
X1 and X2, which only needs land, L, to be produced. There is
international trade in both commodities, so they can be bought and sold to world market prices
Pxwi ,
i=1,2. The production technology is assumed to be Leontief, i.e.

(2)             X1 -1 Li, i=1,2,

γi

where γi is an input-output coefficient and Li is the land used in the production of commodity i. Land
is limited, i.e.

iLil .



More intriguing information

1. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
2. Announcement effects of convertible bond loans versus warrant-bond loans: An empirical analysis for the Dutch market
3. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ALTERNATIVE ECONOMETRIC PACKAGES: AN APPLICATION TO ITALIAN DEPOSIT INTEREST RATES
4. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
5. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
6. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
7. The economic doctrines in the wine trade and wine production sectors: the case of Bastiat and the Port wine sector: 1850-1908
8. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
9. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
10. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
11. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany
12. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
13. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom
14. The name is absent
15. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
16. The name is absent
17. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions
18. The name is absent
19. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
20. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52