Table 7. Impact by region induced by accession financial package per macro-sector, Romania, 2007-
09.
|
Region |
Labour Income |
Employment | ||||||||
|
Million euro (2000 prices) |
% |
% on |
Var % |
Y/PE (%) |
Units |
% |
% on |
Var % |
E/PE* | |
|
NER | ||||||||||
|
Agric. |
27.7 |
7.2 |
21.5 |
21.3 |
14.6 |
153,720 |
55.7 |
22.1 |
21.3 |
809.9 |
|
Industry |
153.3 |
39.7 |
14.2 |
21.6 |
19.0 |
66,916 |
24.2 |
16.4 |
21.1 |
82.8 |
|
Services |
204.8 |
53.1 |
16.9 |
21.1 |
31.0 |
55,491 |
20.1 |
18.5 |
18.8 |
83.9 |
|
TOTAL |
385.8 |
100.0 |
15.9 |
21.3 |
23.3 |
276,126 |
100.0 |
19.7 |
20.7 |
166.4 |
|
SER | ||||||||||
|
Agric |
12.7 |
4.6 |
9.9 |
13.8 |
12.9 |
66,576 |
46.5 |
9.6 |
13.8 |
678.2 |
|
Industry |
110.7 |
40.1 |
10.2 |
14.2 |
20.9 |
39,189 |
27.3 |
9.6 |
14.2 |
74.1 |
|
Services |
152.9 |
55.3 |
12.6 |
15.5 |
36.6 |
37,556 |
26.2 |
12.6 |
14.0 |
89.9 |
|
TOTAL |
276.3 |
100.0 |
11.4 |
14.9 |
26.4 |
143,321 |
100.0 |
10.2 |
14.0 |
137.2 |
|
SR | ||||||||||
|
Agric |
42.8 |
9.7 |
33.3 |
35.0 |
29.8 |
220,106 |
63.8 |
31.6 |
35.0 |
1,534.2 |
|
Industry |
220.4 |
50.0 |
20.4 |
24.8 |
34.9 |
78,571 |
22.8 |
19.2 |
23.3 |
124.3 |
|
Services |
177.4 |
40.3 |
14.6 |
18.7 |
36.1 |
46,246 |
13.4 |
15.5 |
17.1 |
94.0 |
|
TOTAL |
440.6 |
100.0 |
18.2 |
22.5 |
34.8 |
344,923 |
100.0 |
24.6 |
27.9 |
272.1 |
|
SWR | ||||||||||
|
Agric |
14.1 |
5.3 |
11.0 |
16.2 |
14.0 |
79,200 |
52.1 |
11.4 |
16.2 |
786.8 |
|
Industry |
134.2 |
50.8 |
12.4 |
19.5 |
28.9 |
43,262 |
28.5 |
10.6 |
19.4 |
93.3 |
|
Services |
116.0 |
43.9 |
9.6 |
16.4 |
33.9 |
29,483 |
19.4 |
9.9 |
15.0 |
86.1 |
|
TOTAL |
264.3 |
100.0 |
10.9 |
17.8 |
29.2 |
151,945 |
100.0 |
10.8 |
16.7 |
167.6 |
|
WR | ||||||||||
|
Agric |
6.8 |
3.3 |
5.3 |
13.0 |
9.5 |
38,455 |
38.6 |
5.5 |
13.0 |
537.2 |
|
Industry |
96.4 |
47.4 |
8.9 |
14.2 |
36.6 |
34,790 |
35.0 |
8.5 |
13.8 |
132.2 |
|
Services |
100.0 |
49.2 |
8.2 |
13.5 |
30.7 |
26,289 |
26.4 |
8.8 |
11.9 |
80.7 |
|
TOTAL |
203.2 |
100.0 |
8.4 |
13.8 |
30.8 |
99,533 |
100.0 |
7.1 |
12.9 |
150.6 |
|
NWR | ||||||||||
|
Agric |
13.4 |
5.3 |
10.4 |
14.3 |
15.5 |
77,027 |
48.6 |
11.1 |
14.3 |
888.8 |
|
Industry |
109.0 |
43.0 |
10.1 |
16.0 |
26.1 |
46,854 |
29.6 |
11.5 |
15.7 |
112.3 |
|
Services |
131.1 |
51.7 |
10.8 |
14.1 |
31.9 |
34,590 |
21.8 |
11.6 |
12.9 |
84.3 |
|
TOTAL |
253.5 |
100.0 |
10.5 |
14.9 |
27.7 |
158,471 |
100.0 |
11.3 |
14.4 |
173.3 |
|
CR | ||||||||||
|
Agric |
9.9 |
3.4 |
7.7 |
15.4 |
14.3 |
55,529 |
36.4 |
8.0 |
15.4 |
802.5 |
|
Industry |
157.0 |
53.9 |
14.5 |
18.0 |
36.0 |
63,786 |
41.9 |
15.6 |
17.5 |
146.5 |
|
Services |
124.7 |
42.8 |
10.3 |
13.0 |
38.4 |
33,098 |
21.7 |
11.1 |
12.0 |
101.8 |
|
TOTAL |
291.5 |
100.0 |
12.0 |
15.4 |
35.1 |
152,413 |
100.0 |
10.9 |
15.2 |
183.7 |
|
BR | ||||||||||
|
Agric |
1.2 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
10.7 |
37.4 |
5,847 |
7.5 |
0.8 |
10.7 |
1,757.8 |
|
Industry |
101.7 |
32.9 |
9.4 |
12.7 |
58.5 |
35,249 |
45.4 |
8.6 |
12.2 |
202.9 |
|
Services |
206.5 |
66.7 |
17.0 |
9.7 |
92.9 |
36,484 |
47.0 |
12.2 |
9.0 |
164.0 |
|
TOTAL |
309.5 |
100.0 |
12.8 |
10.5 |
77.5 |
77,579 |
100.0 |
5.5 |
10.4 |
194.2 |
|
Romania | ||||||||||
|
Agric |
128.6 |
5.3 |
100.0 |
19.7 |
16.9 |
696,459 |
49.6 |
100.0 |
19.5 |
912.9 |
|
Industry |
1,082.7 |
44.7 |
100.0 |
17.8 |
29.1 |
408,617 |
29.1 |
100.0 |
17.3 |
109.8 |
|
Services |
_________1,213.4 |
50.0 |
100.0 |
14.5 |
38.0 |
299,236 |
21.3 |
100.0 |
13.6 |
93.6 |
|
TOTAL |
________2,424.8 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
16.0 |
31.6 |
1,404,312 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
17.3 |
182.8 |
*The ratio employment-public expenditure is expressed for each one € million.
Source: Author’s elaboration
12
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Political Rents, Promotion Incentives, and Support for a Non-Democratic Regime
4. On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms
5. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure
6. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
7. PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON
8. Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new ‘project-object’
9. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
10. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds