Table 7. Impact by region induced by accession financial package per macro-sector, Romania, 2007-
09.
Region |
Labour Income |
Employment | ||||||||
Million euro (2000 prices) |
% |
% on |
Var % |
Y/PE (%) |
Units |
% |
% on |
Var % |
E/PE* | |
NER | ||||||||||
Agric. |
27.7 |
7.2 |
21.5 |
21.3 |
14.6 |
153,720 |
55.7 |
22.1 |
21.3 |
809.9 |
Industry |
153.3 |
39.7 |
14.2 |
21.6 |
19.0 |
66,916 |
24.2 |
16.4 |
21.1 |
82.8 |
Services |
204.8 |
53.1 |
16.9 |
21.1 |
31.0 |
55,491 |
20.1 |
18.5 |
18.8 |
83.9 |
TOTAL |
385.8 |
100.0 |
15.9 |
21.3 |
23.3 |
276,126 |
100.0 |
19.7 |
20.7 |
166.4 |
SER | ||||||||||
Agric |
12.7 |
4.6 |
9.9 |
13.8 |
12.9 |
66,576 |
46.5 |
9.6 |
13.8 |
678.2 |
Industry |
110.7 |
40.1 |
10.2 |
14.2 |
20.9 |
39,189 |
27.3 |
9.6 |
14.2 |
74.1 |
Services |
152.9 |
55.3 |
12.6 |
15.5 |
36.6 |
37,556 |
26.2 |
12.6 |
14.0 |
89.9 |
TOTAL |
276.3 |
100.0 |
11.4 |
14.9 |
26.4 |
143,321 |
100.0 |
10.2 |
14.0 |
137.2 |
SR | ||||||||||
Agric |
42.8 |
9.7 |
33.3 |
35.0 |
29.8 |
220,106 |
63.8 |
31.6 |
35.0 |
1,534.2 |
Industry |
220.4 |
50.0 |
20.4 |
24.8 |
34.9 |
78,571 |
22.8 |
19.2 |
23.3 |
124.3 |
Services |
177.4 |
40.3 |
14.6 |
18.7 |
36.1 |
46,246 |
13.4 |
15.5 |
17.1 |
94.0 |
TOTAL |
440.6 |
100.0 |
18.2 |
22.5 |
34.8 |
344,923 |
100.0 |
24.6 |
27.9 |
272.1 |
SWR | ||||||||||
Agric |
14.1 |
5.3 |
11.0 |
16.2 |
14.0 |
79,200 |
52.1 |
11.4 |
16.2 |
786.8 |
Industry |
134.2 |
50.8 |
12.4 |
19.5 |
28.9 |
43,262 |
28.5 |
10.6 |
19.4 |
93.3 |
Services |
116.0 |
43.9 |
9.6 |
16.4 |
33.9 |
29,483 |
19.4 |
9.9 |
15.0 |
86.1 |
TOTAL |
264.3 |
100.0 |
10.9 |
17.8 |
29.2 |
151,945 |
100.0 |
10.8 |
16.7 |
167.6 |
WR | ||||||||||
Agric |
6.8 |
3.3 |
5.3 |
13.0 |
9.5 |
38,455 |
38.6 |
5.5 |
13.0 |
537.2 |
Industry |
96.4 |
47.4 |
8.9 |
14.2 |
36.6 |
34,790 |
35.0 |
8.5 |
13.8 |
132.2 |
Services |
100.0 |
49.2 |
8.2 |
13.5 |
30.7 |
26,289 |
26.4 |
8.8 |
11.9 |
80.7 |
TOTAL |
203.2 |
100.0 |
8.4 |
13.8 |
30.8 |
99,533 |
100.0 |
7.1 |
12.9 |
150.6 |
NWR | ||||||||||
Agric |
13.4 |
5.3 |
10.4 |
14.3 |
15.5 |
77,027 |
48.6 |
11.1 |
14.3 |
888.8 |
Industry |
109.0 |
43.0 |
10.1 |
16.0 |
26.1 |
46,854 |
29.6 |
11.5 |
15.7 |
112.3 |
Services |
131.1 |
51.7 |
10.8 |
14.1 |
31.9 |
34,590 |
21.8 |
11.6 |
12.9 |
84.3 |
TOTAL |
253.5 |
100.0 |
10.5 |
14.9 |
27.7 |
158,471 |
100.0 |
11.3 |
14.4 |
173.3 |
CR | ||||||||||
Agric |
9.9 |
3.4 |
7.7 |
15.4 |
14.3 |
55,529 |
36.4 |
8.0 |
15.4 |
802.5 |
Industry |
157.0 |
53.9 |
14.5 |
18.0 |
36.0 |
63,786 |
41.9 |
15.6 |
17.5 |
146.5 |
Services |
124.7 |
42.8 |
10.3 |
13.0 |
38.4 |
33,098 |
21.7 |
11.1 |
12.0 |
101.8 |
TOTAL |
291.5 |
100.0 |
12.0 |
15.4 |
35.1 |
152,413 |
100.0 |
10.9 |
15.2 |
183.7 |
BR | ||||||||||
Agric |
1.2 |
0.4 |
0.9 |
10.7 |
37.4 |
5,847 |
7.5 |
0.8 |
10.7 |
1,757.8 |
Industry |
101.7 |
32.9 |
9.4 |
12.7 |
58.5 |
35,249 |
45.4 |
8.6 |
12.2 |
202.9 |
Services |
206.5 |
66.7 |
17.0 |
9.7 |
92.9 |
36,484 |
47.0 |
12.2 |
9.0 |
164.0 |
TOTAL |
309.5 |
100.0 |
12.8 |
10.5 |
77.5 |
77,579 |
100.0 |
5.5 |
10.4 |
194.2 |
Romania | ||||||||||
Agric |
128.6 |
5.3 |
100.0 |
19.7 |
16.9 |
696,459 |
49.6 |
100.0 |
19.5 |
912.9 |
Industry |
1,082.7 |
44.7 |
100.0 |
17.8 |
29.1 |
408,617 |
29.1 |
100.0 |
17.3 |
109.8 |
Services |
_________1,213.4 |
50.0 |
100.0 |
14.5 |
38.0 |
299,236 |
21.3 |
100.0 |
13.6 |
93.6 |
TOTAL |
________2,424.8 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
16.0 |
31.6 |
1,404,312 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
17.3 |
182.8 |
*The ratio employment-public expenditure is expressed for each one € million.
Source: Author’s elaboration
12
More intriguing information
1. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence2. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
3. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS
4. Output Effects of Agri-environmental Programs of the EU
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
8. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience
9. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
10. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen