Conditional on βn, the probability that a manager of a facility with Tn regulated
units makes the observed Tn compliance choices is:
τn
PUn = i) ≡ pRpt(β) = ∏
t=l
eβn'xnU
(7)
Jnt
∑eβJχnjt
J=l
where i is a Tn * 1 dimensional vector denoting the sequence of observed choices.
Unconditional choice probabilities are derived by integrating conditional choice prob-
abilities over the distribution of unobserved random parameters (Train, 2003). The
θ vector of unknown parameters describes the distribution of β. The parameter esti-
mates are those that maximize the following log likelihood function:
ɪ 7 jn eβ'χn<t
LL(θ) = ∑ln ∏j ------f (β ∖θ)dβ,
(8)
n=l t t=l я'^
—ɔo ∖ eβ χnjt
J=l
Jnt is the number of viable compliance alternatives available to unit t operated by
manager n. Because this integral does not have a closed form solution, the uncon-
ditional probabilities are approximated numerically through simulation. For each
decision maker, R draws of β are taken from the density f (β ∣θ)jone for each decision
maker. For each draw, the value of [7] is calculated for each decision maker. The
results are averaged across draws. Simulated maximum likelihood estimates of the
parameters maximize the following:.
N R Tn
SLL(θ') = £ ln I £||
n=l r=l t=l
eβn'≈n>t
Jnt
(9)
∑ef,t⅛t
J=l
To increase the accuracy of the simulation, 1000 pseudo-random Halton draws are
20
More intriguing information
1. On the job rotation problem2. The name is absent
3. Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers
4. Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program
5. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
6. The name is absent
7. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
8. The name is absent
9. The Effects of Attendance on Academic Performance: Panel Data Evidence for Introductory Microeconomics
10. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE