Table 4: Measures of Data Fit
Technology fixed effects only |
CLI |
CLII |
RPL | |
Log-Iikelihood value |
-1008.10 |
955.04 |
917.17 |
783.61 |
at convergence | ||||
Number of parameters |
8 |
10 |
14 |
20 |
LR test statistic |
- |
106.12 |
75.74 |
267.12 |
p-value |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
<0.001 |
Table 5: Average Capital Cost and Variable Compliance Cost
Marginal Effects for Commonly Selected Technologies(RPL)
Technology |
Capital cost marginal effects |
Variable cost marginal effects | ||
Regulated |
Restructured |
Regulated |
Restructured | |
CM |
-0.051 |
-0.090 |
-0.072 |
-0.109 |
LNB |
-0.125 |
-0.204 |
-0.147 |
-0.246 |
SCR |
-0.008 |
-0.013 |
-0.043 |
-0.049 |
SNCR |
-0.045 |
-0.075 |
-0.081 |
-0.119 |
Table 6: Elasticities of Choice Probabilities with Respect to Capital Cost
for Commonly Selected Technologies
Technology |
CLI |
RPL | ||
Regulated |
Restructured |
Regulated |
Restructured | |
CM |
-0.12 |
-0.55 |
-0.99 |
-1.70 |
LNB |
-0.18 |
-0.32 |
-1.40 |
-2.29 |
SCR |
-0.67 |
-1.46 |
-6.22 |
-10.76 |
SNCR |
-0.14 |
-0.22 |
-1.05 |
-1.76 |
Table 7: Elasticities of Choice Probabilities with Respect to Variable Compliance
Costs for Commonly Selected Technologies
Technology |
CLI |
RPL | ||
Regulated |
Restructured |
Regulated |
Restructured | |
CM |
-1.33 |
-1.43 |
-3.17 |
-5.22 |
LNB |
-1.11 |
-1.23 |
-2.53 |
-4.02 |
SCR |
-0.79 |
-1.14 |
-2.20 |
-3.76 |
SNCR |
-2.13 |
-2.19 |
-4.65 |
-7.40 |
43
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
3. Cyber-pharmacies and emerging concerns on marketing drugs Online
4. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
5. The changing face of Chicago: demographic trends in the 1990s
6. Spatial Aggregation and Weather Risk Management
7. Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?
8. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
9. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect
10. Constrained School Choice