% Change of Welfare from Base
-6 -5
-4 -3
NF(10%)
P Pw3
PEST(200%)
O
A ENG(200%)
■ OUTP(50%)
O PEST(50%)
0pest(100%)eNG(50%)
NF(50%) ,,'Pw1
A ENG(100%) '.OUTP(10%)
♦ NF(100%) .∙-'^
× Pw2
Ifl OUTP(25%)
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
-16
INF (*) - N-fertilizer Tax , PEST(*) - pesticide tax, ENG (*) - energy tax, OUTP(*) - output tax∣
Figure 1 Egypt: Welfare and Irrigation Water Demand Changes
-0.3
NF-
PEST- PEST- PEST-
OUTP- OUTP- OUTP-
ENG- ENG- ENG-
50% 100% 200%
50% 100% 200%
10% 50% 100%
10% 25% 50%
NF- NF-
Pw2 Pw3
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
Figure 2 Egypt: Comparisons on Water Demand Elasticity
35
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
3. The name is absent
4. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM
5. fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences
6. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
7. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
8. Evolutionary Clustering in Indonesian Ethnic Textile Motifs
9. DISCUSSION: POLICY CONSIDERATIONS OF EMERGING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES
10. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR