The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement



M. Geuze


Endnotes

1. Matthijs Geuze has been Senior Counsellor in the World Intellectual Property
Organization since 2002. From 1989 to 2002 he was employed by the Secretariat
of the GATT and the World Trade Organization, and from 1981 to 1989 by the
Dutch Patent Office. The views expressed are his personal views rather than those
of the organisations with which he is or has been affiliated.

2. See WIPO document SCT/8/4.

3. The WTO Agreement is a reflection of the single undertaking embarked upon in
the Uruguay Round of multilateral trade negotiations: a negotiating package
consisting of subjects put forward by the various trading partners, which, when
negotiated on their own, would not likely have led to a successful outcome among
all trading partners. This negotiating package had to be adopted as a whole, i.e.,
“nothing was agreed until everything was agreed.”

4. WTO document IP/C/W/253 and IP/C/W/253/Rev.1.

5. Matthijs Geuze, “Protection of Geographical Indications under the TRIPS
Agreement and Related Work of the World Trade Organization.” WIPO
Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications in the
Worldwide Context, Eger, Hungary, 24-25 October 1997. WIPO Publication No.
760.

6. Dariel de Sousa, “Protection of Geographical Indications under the TRIPS
Agreement and Related Work of the World Trade Organization (WTO).” WIPO
Symposium on the International Protection of Geographical Indications,
Montevideo, Uruguay, 28-29 November 2001.

7. The provisions that lay down these obligations are contained in Articles 3 and 4 of
the TRIPS Agreement. Australia and the United States initiated dispute settlement
procedures against the European Communities for its non-compliance with these
obligations. See the panel reports contained in WTO documents WT/DS174/R
and WT/DS290/R.

8. Part III of the TRIPS Agreement (i.e., Articles 41 to 61).

9. Article 2.1 of the TRIPS Agreement.

10. For background information on proposals tabled in the negotiations, reference is
made to Daniel Gervais,
The TRIPS Agreement - Drafting History and Analysis.
2nd edition. London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2003.

11. As regards the definition of the Lisbon Agreement, reference is made to Matthijs
Geuze, “Let’s Have An Other Look at the Lisbon Agreement - its Terms in their

62


Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
3. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
4. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN FARMERS IN AFRICA: LESSONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; WITH AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
5. Hemmnisse für die Vernetzungen von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft abbauen
6. Globalization, Divergence and Stagnation
7. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
8. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
9. INSTITUTIONS AND PRICE TRANSMISSION IN THE VIETNAMESE HOG MARKET
10. The name is absent
11. LAND-USE EVALUATION OF KOCAELI UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS AREA
12. Regional Intergration and Migration: An Economic Geography Model with Hetergenous Labour Force
13. On Social and Market Sanctions in Deterring non Compliance in Pollution Standards
14. The name is absent
15. Spectral calibration of exponential Lévy Models [1]
16. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
17. A Brief Introduction to the Guidance Theory of Representation
18. Accurate, fast and stable denoising source separation algorithms
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent