23
Figure 7 The development of employed persons in the city of Dortmund in comparison to selected cities 1976-2000
120 -г
1976 = 100
100
80
Hd FRG (13,4%)
gglomerations (13,5%)
ürnberg (9,6%)
^Mannheim (4,0%)
Aggl. Centres (3,1%)
Stuttgart (2,9%)
****Koln (14%)
^DO-HAM-UN (-3,0%)
Bochum (-6,1%)
Essen (-9,8%)
Dortmund (-13,5%)
Duisburg (-26,7%)
60
1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000
Source: Bade et al. , 2002, 9
23
More intriguing information
1. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance2. Langfristige Wachstumsaussichten der ukrainischen Wirtschaft : Potenziale und Barrieren
3. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
4. The name is absent
5. Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment
6. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
7. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
8. Critical Race Theory and Education: Racism and antiracism in educational theory and praxis David Gillborn*
9. Novelty and Reinforcement Learning in the Value System of Developmental Robots
10. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN