Table 4. Dimensional structure of social cohesion indicators (factor loadings)
Extracted dimensions | |||||
Components of |
Indicators of social cohesion |
‘solidarity’ |
‘participation’ |
3 |
4 |
Civic participation |
Discussing politics |
Л0- |
-^37^ |
.61 |
.26" |
Belonging to different |
.09^ |
.75“ |
.43^ |
.35^ | |
Tolerance |
No objection to immigrants as |
.32^ |
.52 |
-.27 |
-.02 |
No objection to homosexuals as |
.59 |
.46- |
-.45 |
-.14 | |
Social trust |
Most people can be trusted |
33 |
-.07 |
j2" | |
Institutional trust |
Trust in parliament |
.05^ |
-.61 |
-.49 |
.04^ |
Common values |
Consensus on gender equality |
.62 |
-.53- |
JfT |
-.27 |
Consensus on democracy as |
.50 |
-.29- |
-.25 |
.27 | |
Consensus on traditional/secular |
-.86“ |
-.28- |
-.15 |
J9- | |
Consensus on |
-.62- |
-.33- |
-.46 |
-.07 | |
Shared sense of |
National pride |
-.52 |
.68- |
-.07 |
-.35 |
Geographic unit of identification |
-.45 |
jΓ^ |
-.39 |
.62 | |
Social order |
100 minus number of homicides |
.58“ |
.04" |
-.09 |
.28- |
Equality |
1 minus Gini coefficient |
.76“ |
.28" |
-.35 |
.04^ |
Explained |
32% |
20% |
12% |
7%- |
More intriguing information
1. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt2. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
3. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
4. L'organisation en réseau comme forme « indéterminée »
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
8. THE EFFECT OF MARKETING COOPERATIVES ON COST-REDUCING PROCESS INNOVATION ACTIVITY
9. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
10. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts