ADJUSTMENT TO GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY IN EUROPE



We now proceed to look at those factors which have affected the performance of the
footwear industry in Europe in the light of globalisation and how European footwear
producers have reacted to increasing foreign competition. In the section above, we
showed that, in general, adjustment of the labour input in Europe has taken the form of
reductions in the quantity employed and that large changes to the relative price of labour
employed in footwear are not apparent.

We start by looking at changes in labour productivity. There are a number of factors that
can influence labour productivity, such as, technological change, changes to the amount
of capital per worker, and changes in skills. Table 8 presents a measure of the change in
labour productivity, the ratio of production in physical units to the utilisation of labour,
for six selected countries for two periods: 1985 relative to 1970 and then 1994 relative
to 1985. Here the data are for total footwear production and so do not reflect the
differences between the production of leather and non-leather footwear.

Over the period 1970-1985, we see that labour productivity improved strongly in Spain
with the average worker producing twice as many pairs of shoes in 1985 as in 1970.
Productivity also grew strongly in Italy and the UK while in the German and Portuguese
footwear sectors labour productivity remained fairly constant. On the other hand, in the
US productivity fell by almost 10 per cent. In the subsequent period until 1994,
productivity continued to grow strongly in Spain and there was a sharp increase in
productivity growth in Portugal, Germany and the US. In contrast, productivity fell
mildly in Italy and was little changed in the UK.

Table 8: Change in Labour Productivity and Output of Footwear in Main Producer

Countries____________________________________________________________________________

Labour productivity1

Index of Output2

1970-1985

1985-1994

1970-1985

1985-1994

Portugal__________

-1.78

35.93

55,5

39.61

Italy_________________

_______56.9_______

_________-7.0

53,9

-32,8

Spain____________

114.4

_______26.7_______

_________3,3_________

-3,5

UK_________

35.54

_______0.97_______

-35.7

-35.8

Germany

6.02

24.6

-46.95

-35.63

US___________

-9.22

_______20.4_______

-51.63

-20.15

Source: ISIS, OECD

1Iabour productivity is measured by -total production/total number employed (including self-employed)
2output is measured in units; 31985 to 1989

19



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Altruism and fairness in a public pension system
3. The name is absent
4. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
5. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
6. The name is absent
7. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN FARMERS IN AFRICA: LESSONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; WITH AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The constitution and evolution of the stars
12. ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.
13. Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament
14. Regulation of the Electricity Industry in Bolivia: Its Impact on Access to the Poor, Prices and Quality
15. The name is absent
16. New urban settlements in Belarus: some trends and changes
17. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
18. Proceedings from the ECFIN Workshop "The budgetary implications of structural reforms" - Brussels, 2 December 2005
19. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
20. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY