Public infrastructure capital, scale economies and returns to variety



[where,       φ n

φ x
φ v

φ F


n((a - v)x0 + b - F) + γnγ (vx0 + F)

(19)

(20)

(21)

(22)]

(23)


m

n((a - v) x0 + nγ vx0 )

m

( n - nγ ) vx 0

m

( nγ - n ) F

m

PM = (1 - a) n+ P c = 0

Equation 17 shows the changes in the price of intermediate goods as a result of a change of
public capital provision (the subsidy to variable costs,
v). This equation also shows that Pc is affected
by changes in
m (factor bundles). Holtz-Eakin and Lovely argued that if resources are withdrawn
from the production of consumption goods (the case where
m> 0), then the price of factor bundles
will rise. The magnitude of this increase depends on the curvature of the production possibility
frontier,
ξ (see Holtz-Eakin and Lovely, p. 112).

The changes in the demand for factor bundles are given by equation 18. It is clear from this
equation that there are three sources of such changes. One results from changes in the number of
intermediate goods producers (shown by the first term of the right-hand side of equation 18). Another
source is changes of the production level of these producers (shown by the second term). Finally,
government purchases can affect the demand for factor bundles (shown by the third and fourth terms).

Equation 23, which closes the system, shows the external price constraint on the supply price
of finished manufactured goods. As this equation demonstrates, an increase (decrease) in the number
[varieties] of intermediate goods will decrease (increase) the supply price (if
a > 1). This change must
be offset by the positive (negative) effect in the price of the intermediate goods.

Holtz-Eakin and Lovely, using this theoretical model, studied the effects of changes in public
capital on the level of output and productivity in equilibrium. They first examined changes in that part
of infrastructure that decreases fixed costs (that is,
F). If the system of equations 16, 17, 18, and 23 is
solved, it is possible to derive the proportionate changes in the price of intermediate goods, the
demand for factor bundles, and the number of intermediate goods. These changes are given in
equations 24, 25, and 26 respectively:

A

Pc


(a - 1)ξ(φ x δ FF )
D

(24)




More intriguing information

1. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
2. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
3. Secondary school teachers’ attitudes towards and beliefs about ability grouping
4. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
5. Motivations, Values and Emotions: Three Sides of the same Coin
6. The name is absent
7. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
8. The name is absent
9. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
10. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
11. The name is absent
12. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
13. News Not Noise: Socially Aware Information Filtering
14. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
15. The Impact of Hosting a Major Sport Event on the South African Economy
16. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
17. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
18. Bird’s Eye View to Indonesian Mass Conflict Revisiting the Fact of Self-Organized Criticality
19. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
20. Evolving robust and specialized car racing skills