Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)



Table 4 reports the Fisher statistics for all the variables used in our structural equa-
tions. The null hypothesis is that the time series has been generated by an
I (1) stochastic
process, and the test follows a chi-square distribution with 34 degrees of freedom (the 5%
critical value is 48.32). Note that all the panel unit root test statistics are greater than
the critical value, so the null of a unit root can be rejected at the 5% significance level.

Table 4: Panel Unit Root Tests

λ (nit) = 66.19

λ (lit)   = 52.78

λ (wit) = 65.27

λ (kit) = 87.93

λ (popit) = 49.37

λ (prit)    = 93.26

Notes:  λ () is the test proposed by Maddala and Wu (1999).

The test follows a chi-square (34) distribution.

The 5% critical value is approximately 48.

Tables 3 and 4 indicate that we can proceed with stationary panel data estimation
techniques.

4.2 Stationary Dynamic Panel Data Model

We estimate the lagged adjustment processes and long-run elasticities of the system of
behavioural equations (14) by using a fixed-effects (FE) model:

A0yit  =  A1yi,t-1 + A2yi,t-2 + B0xit + B1xi,t-1 + C0zt + C1zt-1 + eit,

eit  =  μi + vit, i = 1,...,N, t = 1,...,T,                                    (17)

The above equation shows that the vector29 of disturbances (eit) follows a one-way error
component model, where
vit ~ iid (0, σ2ν) with Cov (

eit, ejt) = 0, for i = j. The vector
of scalars
μi represents the effects that are specific to the ith region and are assumed to
remain constant over time. In other words, the FE model assumes that slope coefficients
and variances are identical across regions and only intercepts are allowed to vary.

The FE estimator30 is the most common estimator for dynamic panels. In homogenous
dynamic panels (i.e. models with constant slopes) the FE estimator is consistent as
T → ∞, for fixed N.31 Baltagi and Griffin (1997) compare the performance of a large
number of homogenous and heterogeneous estimators and provide evidence in support
of the FE estimator. In particular, they find that (i) individual unit estimates (both
OLS and 2SLS) exhibit substantial variability, whereas pooled estimators provide more
plausible estimates, and (ii) accounting for potential endogeneity is "disappointing as
the 2SLS estimators performed worse than their counterparts assuming all variables are
exogenous."

the individual ADF regressions.

29 This is a 3 × 1 vector representing the labour demand, wage setting, and labour supply equations in
our system.

30 The fixed-effects estimator is also known as the least squares dummy variables (LSDV) estimator, or
the within-group or the analysis of covariance estimator.

31 Kiviet (1995) showed that the bias of the FE estimator in a dynamic model of panel data has an
approximation error of O N
-1T-3/2 . Therefore, the FE estimator is consistent only as T → ∞, while
it is biased and inconsistent when N is large and T is fixed.

13



More intriguing information

1. Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers
2. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
3. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models
4. The name is absent
5. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
6. The name is absent
7. Review of “The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas”
8. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
9. The Dictator and the Parties A Study on Policy Co-operation in Mineral Economies
10. NATURAL RESOURCE SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: A COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH
11. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
12. Mean Variance Optimization of Non-Linear Systems and Worst-case Analysis
13. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. The name is absent
17. Transport system as an element of sustainable economic growth in the tourist region
18. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
19. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden
20. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics