Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)



7 Total Effects of Actual Shocks

So far we measured (i) the responses of unemployment to hypothetical one-off unit labour
market shocks and (ii) the contributions of the exogenous variables to the evolution of the
unemployment rate during the sample period. To complete our analysis of labour market
dynamics and unemployment reactions to economic shocks, we now seek to answer a
rather different question. How has unemployment responded to the changes that each of
the exogenous variables underwent during our sample?

For ease of exposition suppose the estimated reduced form unemployment rate equa-
tion is given by40

uit = ρui,t-1 + czt, t=0,1,2,...,T.                             (19)

In this illustrative model unemployment is dynamically stable (|p| 1) and depends on
the exogenous variable
z . Assuming for simplicity that unemployment is initially at its
steady state, if the exogenous variable remains constant then unemployment will also
remain constant. We can thus say that the changes in the exogenous variable
z determine
the trajectory of the unemployment rate.

At each point in time we define the shock in the exogenous variable, 6t, as the difference
between its value at year
t and its value at the base year t = 0:

t

ɛt Zt - Zo = ^ Zj ,

(20)


j=1

where Zt Zt - Zt-1 is the annual change of the series. In other words, the actual shock
of the exogenous variable at a point in time
t, 6t, is given by the cumulative sum of its
yearly changes. Unemployment is thus driven by a series of actual shocks (
6l,62, ...,6t)
occuring during the sample period.

In line with the analysis in Section 2, the unemployment responses to all shocks during
the sample period are given by the following triangular
(T × T ) matrix:

C ceι

_

_
.

.. -

cρe1

c62

_
.

_

..

2
2e1

cρ62

c63         .

_

..

■                        (21)

T-1

cP    61

T2
1 2 62

........                   .

τ-363 .

.. ...

■ ctτ /

The number of rows refers to the time periods in the sample and the number of colums to
the actual shocks. In particular, the
jth column of the above matrix gives the responses
of unemployment to the
jth shock at every period in the sample. The tth row of (21)

40 This dynamic model without spillovers provides the simplest analytical tool to explain how we com-
pute the total effects of actual shocks. This methodology is then applied to our estimated labour market
model (the results are given in Table 8 below).

23



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
3. The name is absent
4. The Nobel Memorial Prize for Robert F. Engle
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. National curriculum assessment: how to make it better
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. A dynamic approach to the tendency of industries to cluster
11. LAND-USE EVALUATION OF KOCAELI UNIVERSITY MAIN CAMPUS AREA
12. Hemmnisse für die Vernetzungen von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft abbauen
13. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
14. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
15. Fiscal Sustainability Across Government Tiers
16. Washington Irving and the Knickerbocker Group
17. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
18. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
19. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries
20. The name is absent