Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development



1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Bauska

District

Lithuania

“67

-.7

“9.4

4667

~L2

“8

Aizkraukle

District

Lithuania

“90

^T2

T9

^434

~L2

“6

Jekabpils

District

Lithuania

~442

"T2

12.3

“619

~L2

T5

Daugavpils

District

Lithuania,
Byelorussia

~229

"T4

20.5

~664

“0.8

~20

Kraslava

District

Byelorussia

~268

-12.9

19.4

~226

“0.6

~23

Ludza

District

Russia

^267

-13.2

24.5

^^238

“0.5

266

Balvi

District

Russia

~220

-10.4

25.8

~224

“0.4

244

Aluksne

District

Russia,
Estonia

^200

-J

“8.5

^^263

“0.5

Л9

Valka

District

Estonia

~577

T5

T2

^3^23

“0/7

Лз

Valmiera

District

Estonia

^107

TI

“8.0

^^845

T9

Limbazi

District

Estonia

“87

“7.4

^431

“0.9

~12

Source: Latvia's regions in figures 2003, Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, Riga,
2003

Latvias road atlas, Jana seta, 2002

Development of Regions in Latvia, State company Ltd. “Regional Development”,
2003

Result from table 1 shows four districts particularly with negative tendencies of
development. All four districts has border with Russia or Byelorussia. There is lowest
level of living because very high unemployment rate in these regions: 3 times higher
as the average unemployment rate in Latvia in year 2002. It is connected with changes
from 1991 when there was necessity to change thinking and understandings about free
trade philosophy and start to take decisions themselves not to fill commands. This
tendency has close interaction with activity of enterprise numbers, which is also the
lowest number in these regions. The crucial indicator is number of natural increase of
population for tourism development in cross border development and cooperation
processes. It is key element of development in cross border regions because without
human resources are not possible to develop any activities: to establish enterprises; to
create new jobs; to cooperate with neighbourhoods regions, to develop economic
diversification activities. The average natural increase of population rate is negative in
all Latvia country -5.1 in 2002, but the most negative indicator is in Ludza district -
13.2. There is interaction between indicators if low number of natural increase of



More intriguing information

1. Orientation discrimination in WS 2
2. Outline of a new approach to the nature of mind
3. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
4. Activation of s28-dependent transcription in Escherichia coli by the cyclic AMP receptor protein requires an unusual promoter organization
5. Evidence of coevolution in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
6. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
7. Cultural Neuroeconomics of Intertemporal Choice
8. The name is absent
9. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
10. The name is absent