Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach



lnL=[YjlnΛ(β'xi)+(1-Yj)ln(1(β'xi))]
j

(7)


By differentiating equation (7), we find the marginal effects at the sample mean of the
regressors on the probabilities as (Greene, 1997):

Pγ=1
x i


= PY =1


β- Y=1PYβ

Y=0


(β'xi)-[1(β'xi)]


(8)


A goodness of fit measure based on the likelihood ratio test statistic, usually reported as
McFadden’s
ρ2 measure (Maddala, 1983), is:

ρ 2 = 1 - 'ogL'-'                                                                                        (9)

log Lω

where L ω is the maximum of the likelihood function when maximised with respect to
all parameters and
Lω is the maximum when the likelihood function is maximised with
respect to the constant term only, i.e. setting all the
βs equal to zero. The marginal
effects show how much the probability to report positive change in an indicator of
performance, expressed in percentages, will change if the independent (explanatory)
variable changes by a marginal amount from its sample mean. The marginal effects for
dummy independent variables are estimated as a difference between the variable’s two
values, i.e. 0 and 1 (Greene, 1997).

Our econometric approach suffers from two major drawbacks. Firstly, we assume that
the two tobit models for the percentage of material inputs and for the percentage of
exported product (presented in equation 4 above) are independent and thus are not
jointly estimated. Despite the fact that there is no economic underlying theory pointing
out to the joint estimation of these equations, one could attempt a joint estimation and
compare it with the independent estimations. Secondly, we assume that the effects of
either the percentage of material inputs or the percentage of exported product are
exogenous to the firm’s performance indicators. In other words we do not test for
possible endogeneity of the tobit estimates in equation 3 to the logit model in equation
6. This would require a rather complicated econometric application which will not add
much to our understanding of the real processes at work. Furthermore, in the case where
the two tobit models had been jointly estimated there is not a known test for
endogeneity of simultaneously estimated tobit models in a logit (or probit) model.

15



More intriguing information

1. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
2. fMRI Investigation of Cortical and Subcortical Networks in the Learning of Abstract and Effector-Specific Representations of Motor Sequences
3. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
4. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
5. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
6. Cultural Neuroeconomics of Intertemporal Choice
7. The name is absent
8. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology
9. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine
10. The name is absent
11. Party Groups and Policy Positions in the European Parliament
12. WP 36 - Women's Preferences or Delineated Policies? The development or part-time work in the Netherlands, Germany and the United Kingdom
13. Wettbewerbs- und Industriepolitik - EU-Integration als Dritter Weg?
14. ADJUSTMENT TO GLOBALISATION: A STUDY OF THE FOOTWEAR INDUSTRY IN EUROPE
15. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
16. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
17. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
18. The name is absent
19. Biological Control of Giant Reed (Arundo donax): Economic Aspects
20. The name is absent