effects, such as natural advantages, may be correlated with, for example,
density of economic activity.
An alternative approach is to assume that γj is a fixed effect. This
amounts to including a dummy variable for each elemental alternative (an
alternative specific constant). In this case the dummies absorb the effects
of the yj variables and we may write,
_ exp(β0zjk + Yj )
(7)
Pj/k PJ=1 exp(β'zjk + Yj )
However, in the presence of a large choice set the implementation of this
specification is impractical because of the large number of parameters to be
estimated. On the other hand, in light of the equivalence relation between
the log-likelihoods of the CLM and the Poisson regression, the alternative
specific constant can be viewed as a fixed-effect in a Poisson regression.
Consequently, these effects can be ”conditioned-out”and one can still ob-
tain estimates for the β vector regardless of the number of parameters (see
Appendix B).
The problem with the above approach is that we rely on sectoral variation
to estimate the model and consequently are unable to identify the impact
of variables that only exhibit intraregional variation (i.e. the yj vector).
The marginal impact of these variables is of particular interest in location
studies. However, as long as we have available data for different time periods
exhibiting sufficient time-series variation, one can still obtain estimates for
12
More intriguing information
1. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
5. The name is absent
6. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
7. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
8. The name is absent
9. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen
10. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988