Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region



4. Results

4.1 The Principal Factors

The result obtained from calculating the mean score of each of the 17 factor allocated by the
firm’s directors are presented in Table 1 below. The results of the inter-regional analysis using
the Mann-Whitney a-parametric test are also presented in the Table.

It is clear evidence from the results that most of all the lack of capital resources and the high
level of risk involved in the investment on innovation, reduces the capability of the firm to
engage in innovation. This result is valid also when dividing the firms according to branch
affiliation (see in details in the next section) or location. These kind of limitations could be
handle more successfully by public policy than others, directed in offering capital subsidy or
attract investments of venture capital to the region.

The five principle factors that show the highest mean score present those that ascribed by the
entrepreneurs' order of priorities (presented in Table 1) as hindered mostly the realization of
innovation in their firm. In accordance the most significant obstacles related to excessive
perceived risk, lack of sufficient financial resources and prohibitive cost. The last barrier in
this category related to the lack of skilled personal.

The next group of factors ascribed by medium level of significance includes supportive
factors where their absence hindering the appearance of innovation. These are: the lack of
technological knowledge and the lack of information on market opportunities. This group
includes also uncertainty variable, for example those that involved with the lack of market
demand for the new product or process, or the uncertainty that involved in the timing of
innovation.

All the others eight factors from the presented list hardly influence the ability to innovate. The
insignificant that ascribed to the lack of R&D services as hindering the ability of the firms to
innovate was expected. The important role that R&D services play in contributing to the
engagement of the firms in developing innovation documented in different studies (see for
example: Frenkel 2000; Frenkel et al., 2000, 2001; Roper and Love, 1996; Dosi, 1988;
Rosenberg, 1985; Nelson, 1986).



More intriguing information

1. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
2. What Contribution Can Residential Field Courses Make to the Education of 11-14 Year-olds?
3. The Shepherd Sinfonia
4. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
5. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
6. New Evidence on the Puzzles. Results from Agnostic Identification on Monetary Policy and Exchange Rates.
7. GENE EXPRESSION AND ITS DISCONTENTS Developmental disorders as dysfunctions of epigenetic cognition
8. The name is absent
9. ASSESSMENT OF MARKET RISK IN HOG PRODUCTION USING VALUE-AT-RISK AND EXTREME VALUE THEORY
10. The name is absent
11. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
12. The name is absent
13. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
14. Can a Robot Hear Music? Can a Robot Dance? Can a Robot Tell What it Knows or Intends to Do? Can it Feel Pride or Shame in Company?
15. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
16. Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market
17. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows