EXECUTIVE SUMMARY



Session: Changing Federalism

[Barbara S. Todd -cont.]


state level without accompanying resources? Will local government
have to cut its own programs and services and/or will local citizens
have to generate more and more funds to make up for underfunded
programs passed to the local level?

■ Is there an equitable way to disperse funds so that those who
provide the required services actually get the dollars?

To make the new federalism a real partnership—with all levels
working together to develop mutual respect and a common vision—
will require defining responsibilities...not with some cookie cutter
formula, but real understanding of how the pieces come together.

Counties will need flexibility, along with functional and fiscal
responsibility.

This will require local revenue diversification. Many counties are
strapped now, because their property taxes have a cap.

It also will require limiting Congress’ ability to create national
initiatives that are passed down without accompanying resources. It
will require working out the mistrust that may develop between state
and local governments over the disbursement of such resources.

But it will create a refreshing opportunity to be creative and
innovative. State and federal government can take on a new role as the
source of technological assistance, particularly in rural areas. With its
multiple functions, identities and responsibilities (full-service local
government, a
quasi state agency, a regional actor), county government
can help “win-win” relationships develop on all levels.

There will be more opportunities for intergovernmental service
ContractsJoint service agreements and intergovernmental service
transfers...for contracting among counties and with private service
providers...for forming coalitions with businesses and organizations.

No level of government has a greater role to serve in the establish-
ment of pro-active, cooperative relationships among all levels of
government. For counties to be the government of the future, however,
they will need greater empowerment...an equitable partnership.

I think people are more reluctant to put themselves up for public office
on any level. We abuse and degrade our public officials. It’s a very humbling
experience. Every aspect of your life is open to scrutiny. Ifwe balance our
scrutiny with support, more people may be willing to put their life on the line.


Counties are trying to ensure we ’re heard in the new federalism. We ’re
afraid we 've been barred at the door, much less given a place at the table.

Of course, problems may result from free migration across state
borders. What citizens cost government is higher at certain points in their
lifetime. Ifyou need an example, look at all the people who have moved from
other states, to retire in Florida!



More intriguing information

1. DISCUSSION: ASSESSING STRUCTURAL CHANGE IN THE DEMAND FOR FOOD COMMODITIES
2. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France
3. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
4. Visual Artists Between Cultural Demand and Economic Subsistence. Empirical Findings From Berlin.
5. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. FASTER TRAINING IN NONLINEAR ICA USING MISEP
9. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
10. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
11. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
12. The name is absent
13. Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation
14. Inflation and Inflation Uncertainty in the Euro Area
15. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
16. The name is absent
17. Public infrastructure capital, scale economies and returns to variety
18. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent