IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE



land improvement projects. Some studies suggest that only about 20
percent of the total cost of development projects can be financed
with food.

There appear to be large potentials for using more food for
development purposes if other economic aid also is made available.
Certainly, many countries will require large amounts of food aid
to maintain and improve consumption levels as long as population
growth continues to be high. But developing countries need to plan
the use of food aid over the years ahead so that they gradually will
become self-supporting and can purchase food imports as well as
other imports on a commercial basis.

FOREIGN AID AND AGRICULTURAL TRADE

Our agricultural exports have risen greatly in the last few years
and this growth in exports has been dependent upon income growth
abroad. The total value of agricultural exports increased from a
little under 4 billion dollars a year in 1958 and 1959 to over 6
billion dollars in 1963 and in 1964. Nearly all of this increase has
been in commercial sales for dollars. Dollar sales to the developed
countries account for most of the increase, but there also have been
significant increases in commercial sales to several of the less de-
veloped countries.

Dr. A. B. Mackie of the Economic Research Service recently
completed a study of foreign economic growth and market potentials
for U. S. agricultural products.3 His study shows that we export
about $1.00 worth of farm products per $100 of income to the
less developed as well as the developed countries. In the developed
countries where incomes averaged $700 per capita in 1959-61, we
had farm exports of $6.09 per capita. In the less developed countries
where incomes averaged $ 111, we had farm exports of $ 1.19 per
capita. Moreover, analysis of changes since 1938 indicates that U. S.
agricultural exports to both developed and less developed countries
have increased about 1 percent for each 1 percent increase in in-
come. Because of the large numbers of people in the less developed
countries and population growth expected in the future, they are
large potential markets for U. S. farm products.

A large share of the growth in agricultural exports to the less
developed countries during the last decade has been sales for foreign
currencies and other shipments under other food aid programs. But

■A. B. Mackie, Foreign Economic Growth and Market Potentials for U. S. /Igri-
cultural Products,
U. S. Department of Agriculture, For. Agr. Econ. Rpt. No. 24,
April 1965.

76



More intriguing information

1. Intertemporal Risk Management Decisions of Farmers under Preference, Market, and Policy Dynamics
2. The economic doctrines in the wine trade and wine production sectors: the case of Bastiat and the Port wine sector: 1850-1908
3. The name is absent
4. Perceived Market Risks and Strategic Risk Management of Food Manufactures: Empirical Results from the German Brewing Industry
5. Visual Perception of Humanoid Movement
6. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
7. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
8. The name is absent
9. Unilateral Actions the Case of International Environmental Problems
10. The name is absent
11. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update
12. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
13. The name is absent
14. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE
15. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
16. The name is absent
17. How much do Educational Outcomes Matter in OECD Countries?
18. A Pure Test for the Elasticity of Yield Spreads
19. Licensing Schemes in Endogenous Entry
20. La mobilité de la main-d'œuvre en Europe : le rôle des caractéristiques individuelles et de l'hétérogénéité entre pays