RESPONDENTS GROUPED BY CITY
|
MEN |
WOMEN |
BOYS |
GIRLS |
TOTAL | |
|
Bangalore & Mysore |
17 |
12 |
36 |
9 |
74 |
|
Bombay |
14 |
15 |
29 | ||
|
Calcutta |
19 |
10 |
37 |
66 | |
|
Cochin |
29 |
4 |
33 | ||
|
Coonoor |
1 |
34 |
35 | ||
|
Devlali |
9 |
1 |
27 |
66 |
103 |
|
Faridabad |
23 |
8 |
31 | ||
|
Ketti |
16 |
10 |
36 |
41 |
103 |
|
Madras |
4 |
14 |
8 |
9 |
35 |
|
New Delhi |
65 |
11 |
76 | ||
|
Shillong |
7 |
36 |
43 | ||
|
Total |
203 |
122 |
107 |
196 |
628 |
ANGLO - INDIAN
|
MEN |
WOMEN |
BOYS |
GIRLS |
TOTAL | |
|
Bangalore & Mysore |
13 |
8 |
5 |
26 | |
|
Bombay |
2 |
5 |
7 | ||
|
Calcutta . |
19 |
7 |
37 |
63 | |
|
Cochin |
29 |
4 |
33 | ||
|
Coonoor |
1 |
34 |
35 | ||
|
Devlali |
8 |
1 |
24 |
33 | |
|
Faridabad |
23 |
8 |
31 | ||
|
Ketti |
16 |
10 |
36 |
41 |
103 |
|
Madras |
3 |
14 |
8 |
9 |
34 |
|
New Delhi |
25 |
1 |
26 | ||
|
Shillong |
6 |
1 |
7 | ||
|
Total |
144 |
60 |
73 |
121 |
398 |
|
INDIAN | |||||
|
MEN |
WOMEN |
BOYS |
GIRLS |
TOTAL | |
|
Bangalore & Mysore |
3 |
4 |
31 |
9 |
47 |
|
Bombay |
10 |
6 |
16 | ||
|
Coonoor Devlali |
3 |
66 |
69 | ||
|
Faridabad |
40 |
10 |
50 | ||
|
Total |
53 |
20 |
34 |
75 |
182 |
193
More intriguing information
1. Financial Development and Sectoral Output Growth in 19th Century Germany2. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
3. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
4. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
5. The name is absent
6. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52
7. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective
8. The name is absent
9. The Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Patterns
10. Towards Teaching a Robot to Count Objects