Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994



284


THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL REVIEW

HANNAN, D.F, E. SMYTH, and B. McCABE, 1997. “Educational Achievement and Labour
Market Exclusion in Ireland”, Paper to the European Network for Transitions in Youth
Workshop.

HANNAN, D.F., E. SMYTH, J. McCULLAGH, R. O’LEARY, and D. McMAHON, 1996.
Coeducation and Gender Equality: Exam Performance, Stress and Personal Develop-
ment
, General Research Series No. 169, Dublin: ESRI/Oak Tree Press.

ISHIDA, H., W. MÜLLER, and J.M. RIDGE, 1995. “Class Origin, Class Destination and
Education: a Cross-national Study of Ten Industrial Nations”,
American Journal of
Sociology
, Vol. 101, pp. 145-193.

JENCKS, C., M. SMITH, M. BANE, D. COHEN, H. GINTIS, B. HEYNES, and
S. MICHELSON, 1972.
Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effects of Family and School-
ing in America
, New York: Basic Books.

JONSSON, J.O., 1993. “Persisting Inequalities in Sweden”, in Y. Shavit and H.P. Blossfeld
(eds.),
Persistent Inequality: Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries,
Boulder: Westview Press.

LYNCH, K., 1985. “An Analysis of Some Presuppositions Underlying the Concepts of
Meritocracy and Ability as Presented in Greaney and Kellaghan’s Study”,
The Economic
and Social Review
, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp.83-102.

MARE, R.D., 1980. “Social Background and School Continuation Decisions”, Journal of
the American Statistical Association
, Vol. 75, No. 370, pp. 295-305.

MÜLLER, W., 1996. “Class Inequalities in Educational Outcomes: Sweden in Comparative
Perspective”, in R. Erikson and J.O. Jonsson (eds.),
Can Education Be Equalized?,
Boulder: Westview Press.

PATERSON, L., 1997. “Student Achievement and Educational Change in Scotland, 1980-
1995”,
Scottish Educational Review, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 10-19.

RAFTERY, A.E., and M. HOUT, 1993. “Maximally Maintained Inequality: Expansion,
Reform and Opportunity in Irish Education, 1921-75”,
Sociology of Education, Vol.
66, pp. 41-62.

SHAVIT, Y., and H.P. BLOSSFELD (eds.), 1993. Persistent Inequality: Changing
Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries
. Boulder: Westview Press.

SHAVIT, Y., and H.P. BLOSSFELD, 1996. “Equalizing Educational Opportunity: Do
Gender and Class Compete?”, in
Can Education Be Equalized? The Swedish Case in
Comparative Perspective
, Boulder: Westview Press.

SMYTH, E., 1993. Labour Market Structures and Women’s Employment in Ireland,
Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University College Dublin.

SMYTH, E., 1999. Do Schools Differ? Academic and Personal Development among Pupils
in the Second-Level Sector
, General Research Series No. 171, Dublin: ESRI/Oak Tree
Press.

SMYTH, E. and B. McCABE, 1997. Educational Policy for Socially Excluded Children
and Young People: Ireland
, Report to the Socrates “Success for All” Project.

TYLER, W., 1977. The Sociology of Educational Inequality, London: Methuen.

WHELAN, C.T. and D.F. HANNAN, 1999. “Class Inequalities in Educational Attainment
among the Adult Population in the Republic of Ireland”, see this issue.

WILLIS, P., 1977. Learning to Labour, Hampshire: Gower.



More intriguing information

1. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
2. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE
3. Importing Feminist Criticism
4. Subduing High Inflation in Romania. How to Better Monetary and Exchange Rate Mechanisms?
5. Surveying the welfare state: challenges, policy development and causes of resilience
6. The Clustering of Financial Services in London*
7. The name is absent
8. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
12. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour
13. The name is absent
14. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
15. The name is absent
16. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
17. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
18. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent