songs', that ,it was time to move on to 'real' learning, that writing was a
necessary part of 'real learning' and 'that it provided a new challenge'
(Low et al., 1995). One girl stated that she was quite glad that she was now
doing some writing:
"...because now I can write things in French as well as just spelling them."
(Lowet. al, 1995: 73)
Another girl stated that writing was quite 'good' because:
"...we hardly did any writing in primary, so it's quite interesting to see how to
actually spell the words." (Low et al., 1995: 73)
It has already been stated in Chapter One that Hawkins (1981) argued that the
Pilot Scheme had to be seen as a 'double venture' in that it represented a
'vertical extension' of the teaching of French down the age range as well as a
'horizontal extension' across the ability range. These two crucial variables, age
and ability, can cause problems for the evaluation of learning outcomes. It
appears that many of the ∞mplex issues involved in the Pilot Scheme were
treated in such a general way that decisive variables, such as age and ability,
could often not be isolated and examined closely enough to arrive at a more
objective picture. Similar problems seem to have affected the Scottish National
Pilot.
154
More intriguing information
1. International Financial Integration*2. Education Research Gender, Education and Development - A Partially Annotated and Selective Bibliography
3. Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes
4. The name is absent
5. On s-additive robust representation of convex risk measures for unbounded financial positions in the presence of uncertainty about the market model
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent