songs', that ,it was time to move on to 'real' learning, that writing was a
necessary part of 'real learning' and 'that it provided a new challenge'
(Low et al., 1995). One girl stated that she was quite glad that she was now
doing some writing:
"...because now I can write things in French as well as just spelling them."
(Lowet. al, 1995: 73)
Another girl stated that writing was quite 'good' because:
"...we hardly did any writing in primary, so it's quite interesting to see how to
actually spell the words." (Low et al., 1995: 73)
It has already been stated in Chapter One that Hawkins (1981) argued that the
Pilot Scheme had to be seen as a 'double venture' in that it represented a
'vertical extension' of the teaching of French down the age range as well as a
'horizontal extension' across the ability range. These two crucial variables, age
and ability, can cause problems for the evaluation of learning outcomes. It
appears that many of the ∞mplex issues involved in the Pilot Scheme were
treated in such a general way that decisive variables, such as age and ability,
could often not be isolated and examined closely enough to arrive at a more
objective picture. Similar problems seem to have affected the Scottish National
Pilot.
154
More intriguing information
1. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development2. The name is absent
3. Implementation of a 3GPP LTE Turbo Decoder Accelerator on GPU
4. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001
5. An Interview with Thomas J. Sargent
6. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
7. Stable Distributions
8. Epistemology and conceptual resources for the development of learning technologies
9. Optimal Tax Policy when Firms are Internationally Mobile
10. The name is absent