Table 1: Factor analysis of nationalist items in ISSP National Identity Survey 1995
|
Factor 1 |
Factor 2 | |
|
[COUNTRY] better country than most other countries |
0.86 |
0.02 |
|
World better place if people from other countries more like the |
0.78 |
0.2 |
|
Rather be citizen of [COUNTRY] than of any other country in world |
0.61 |
0.29 |
|
Impossible for people who do not share [NATNLJtraditions to be fully |
-0.01 |
0.71 |
|
People should support their country even if country is wrong |
0.20 |
0.63 |
|
Importance of having been born in [COUNTRY] to be fully [NATIONALITY] |
0.16 |
0.63 |
|
[COUNTRY] should follow own interests, even if conflicts with other nations |
0.23 |
0.55 |
|
Percent variance______________________________________________________ |
26.34 |
24.50 |
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser
Normalization.
Source : Data from ISSP National Identity Survey 1995
29
More intriguing information
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES2. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
3. Midwest prospects and the new economy
4. The name is absent
5. IMPLICATIONS OF CHANGING AID PROGRAMS TO U.S. AGRICULTURE
6. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
7. The Social Context as a Determinant of Teacher Motivational Strategies in Physical Education
8. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey
9. The name is absent
10. The open method of co-ordination: Some remarks regarding old-age security within an enlarged European Union