The name is absent



Do Employers Support Immigration?*

Yuji TaiiiiirJ

October 1, 2007

Abstract

This paper exaiines whether or not being an eiployer was an
iiportant deteriinant of individual preferences for iiiigration re-
striction in the EU ieiber states in the eve of the 2004 enlargeient.
Our results do not confiri that eiployers were iore pro-iiiigration
than the rest by expecting a reduction in the cost of labor except in the
following sector: sanitation-related activities such as refuse disposal
and recreational, cultural and sports activities. On the contrary,
we find that eiployers were iore likely to be anti-iiiigration than
the rest in sectors where foreign workers were highly present, such as
household activities, construction, wholesale, hotels and restaurants.

Key words: individual attitudes toward iiiigration, eiployer, EU

JEL classifications: F22, J23

*I received useful suggestions from Nikolaus Wolf, Mike Harrison and Mike Devereux.
All reiaining errors are iine.

[email protected]; fax.+61 2 6125 0182; Economics Program, Research School
of Social Sciences, Australian National University; Institute for International Integration
Studies, Trinity College Dublin



More intriguing information

1. Types of Cost in Inductive Concept Learning
2. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations
3. The name is absent
4. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure
5. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
6. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
7. The name is absent
8. Økonomisk teorihistorie - Overflødig information eller brugbar ballast?
9. The name is absent
10. Evaluating Consumer Usage of Nutritional Labeling: The Influence of Socio-Economic Characteristics