Insurance within the firm



We generalize equation (2) as:

wij t = a'ijtδ + byj t + ψijt

(7)


where the subscript i stands for the i-th individual and w⅛t is the logarithm of worker
compensation.5 The term ⅛z
t denotes a vector of systematic factors that affect individual
i's compensation, which can vary across workers, firms and time, while ψijt is the stochastic
component of earnings, which is unrelated to the firm’s fortunes. These idiosyncratic shocks
are meant to capture unanticipated fluctuations in individual ability, shocks to productivity
(such as illness), idiosyncratic changes in labor supply (child-raising, family labor supply
effects, etc.).

Let us assume that idiosyncratic earnings shocks are in turn the sum of a permanent
random walk component
ηijt = ηijt-1 + ξijt and a serially uncorrelated transitory shock

μijt.6 Again to save on notation, it is maintained that covariance stationarity holds, i.e.

e (⅛t) = σ, and E ^lijt)


= σ⅛ for all t.

P,


The two shocks are serially uncorrelated and


uncorrelated with each other at all leads and lags.

Taking first differences of (5) and (7), and using the stochastic structure outlined above,
we get the following system of two equations:

A(L,p)Δy∙t = ∆^θ + uj t + ∆υjt                         (8)

A(L,p)Δwijt = ∆alijtλ + ∆z'jt + buj t + b∆vjt

+A(L,p)ξij t + A(L,p)Δμijt                    (9)

where λ = A (L,p) δ. For the purpose of this paper it is more convenient to define firm per-
formance and earnings growth after adjusting for observable firm and worker characteristics,

aWe let earnings to depend on contemporary firm performance, i.e. assume that wages adjust immediately
to changes in performance. In practice, wages might adjust with a lag (think of overtime or bonus decisions,
which are usually taken at the end of the calendar year). Nevertheless, if adjustments are made at a frequency
higher than a year (say, a quarter), annual data of the type used here will not detect deviations from the
contemporaneous adjustment assumption.

0In this context, an idiosyncratic shock to earnings is a purely individual innovation, i.e. it is not shared
by co-workers within the firm.



More intriguing information

1. Om Økonomi, matematik og videnskabelighed - et bud på provokation
2. Washington Irving and the Knickerbocker Group
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
7. The name is absent
8. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
9. The name is absent
10. The Impact of Individual Investment Behavior for Retirement Welfare: Evidence from the United States and Germany
11. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
12. Climate change, mitigation and adaptation: the case of the Murray–Darling Basin in Australia
13. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
14. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
15. Palkkaneuvottelut ja työmarkkinat Pohjoismaissa ja Euroopassa
16. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
17. The name is absent
18. Novelty and Reinforcement Learning in the Value System of Developmental Robots
19. The name is absent
20. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology