NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION



of the test was to measure these immediate memory skills. The form for the phonological
memory test used is given in the Appendix 5.4.

Post test measurements

The children from each age group were randomly allocated to one of four groups (Inference
group, Analogy group, Lexical contrast group, Definition group). The intervention took place
over a period of one week. Children were assigned to Immediate assessment after each
intervention and delayed assessment one week later without any further intervention.
Children’s word knowledge was assessed through seven tasks. Assessing took place twice.
Once after the exposure (Immediate post- test) and one week later (Delayed post-test). The
order of the tasks presentation was the same for all the children across sessions, so that any
order effects would be balanced across children. The measurements used are presented in the
Table 5.3, while the record form for the post-test measurements is presented in Appendix 5.5.

Table 5.3 Post test measurements of Experiment 1

Measurement__________

Question__________________________________________

Naming task

What is this ?

Inference task

What do we do with this ?

Analogy task

Do you know something else like this ? (tell me)

Contrast task

Doyou know something else different from this one ? (tell me)

Multiple choice task

Show me the x.

Definition task

What do you think a(n) x is ?

Sentence generation task

Why do you think they go together ? (a prompt question was
used:
“Which of these two other pictures goes best with this
one
(target item)?”

Naming task was used to test children’s phonological knowledge of the target words as well
as to describe the different responses that children gave to the naming task through an error
analysis. Inference task was used to assess children’s understanding of the target words’
meaning. Analogy task was designed to investigate to what extent children were able to relate
the target words with others from the same semantic category in terms of similarity. The
contrast task was used to identify to what extent children were able to relate the target words
with others from the same semantic category (in terms of contrast), as well as to explore all
the other different sorts of relations they would provide. The aim of the multiple choice task

102



More intriguing information

1. Connectionism, Analogicity and Mental Content
2. The name is absent
3. AN ANALYTICAL METHOD TO CALCULATE THE ERGODIC AND DIFFERENCE MATRICES OF THE DISCOUNTED MARKOV DECISION PROCESSES
4. The name is absent
5. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
6. Linking Indigenous Social Capital to a Global Economy
7. Cyclical Changes in Short-Run Earnings Mobility in Canada, 1982-1996
8. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
9. Trade Liberalization, Firm Performance and Labour Market Outcomes in the Developing World: What Can We Learn from Micro-LevelData?
10. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
14. The name is absent
15. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
16. Infrastructure Investment in Network Industries: The Role of Incentive Regulation and Regulatory Independence
17. AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR REAL-TIME MESOSCALE WEATHER INFORMATION
18. Towards a Strategy for Improving Agricultural Inputs Markets in Africa
19. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
20. The name is absent