NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION



Whether the same pattern was evident for each age group was also investigated. Each one of
the age groups performed better in the Inference and Lexical contrast than the other
conditions. However, the differences were not significant.

To what extent does children ,s success in the naming task change between the immediate and
the delayed post test ?

Children performed better in the immediate (47.6%) than the delayed post test (22.6%). The
differences were significant (Wilcoxon: Z=6.8, p<.0000). The same pattern was evident
within each age group [4yrs, Wilcoxon: Z=3.O3, p<.005; 5yrs, Wilcoxon: Z=3.5, p<.0005;
6 yrs: Z=4.9, p<.0000). Furthermore, the same pattern was found within each linguistic
condition [Inference, Wilcoxon: 3.5, p<.0005; Analogy, Wilcoxon: Z=2.5, p<.05; Contrast:
Z=3.9, p<.0005; Definition, Wilcoxon: Z=2.5, p<.005)

To what extent does children ,s performance on the naming task differ by their existing
vocabulary?

There was a trend for the children with high existing vocabulary to perform better on the
naming task than the children with low existing vocabulary for both post tests (see Table in
the Appendix 5.9). The same pattern was found within each age group and within each
linguistic condition. Significant differences were found for the Definition group during the
delayed post test (Mann-Whitney: Z=2.09, p<.05).

To what extent does children ,s performance on the naming task differ by their phonological
memory?

Children with high phonological memory performed better on the naming task than the
children with low phonological memory for both post tests (see Table in Appendix 5.10).
Significant differences were found during the immediate post test (Mann-Whitney: Z=2.7,
p<.05). The same pattern was found within each age group, however, the differences were
not significant. Furthermore, the same pattern was found within each linguistic condition.
Significant differences were found during the immediate post test for the Inference condition
(Mann-Whitney: Z=2.1, p<.05) and the Lexical contrast condition (Mann-Whitney: Z=2.7,
p<,05).

116



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
3. Private tutoring at transition points in the English education system: its nature, extent and purpose
4. The name is absent
5. Julkinen T&K-rahoitus ja sen vaikutus yrityksiin - Analyysi metalli- ja elektroniikkateollisuudesta
6. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
7. The name is absent
8. Happiness in Eastern Europe
9. The Integration Order of Vector Autoregressive Processes
10. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN TENNESSEE ON WATER USE AND CONTROL - AGRICULTURAL PHASES
11. Implementation of Rule Based Algorithm for Sandhi-Vicheda Of Compound Hindi Words
12. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
13. The name is absent
14. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"
15. Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered
16. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
17. Voting by Committees under Constraints
18. Does Market Concentration Promote or Reduce New Product Introductions? Evidence from US Food Industry
19. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
20. The name is absent