NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION



Table 7.2 Design OfExperiment 2

Groups______

Pre-test

______Session 1_________

_________Session 2_______

_________Session 3_________

Exp.__________

Ass

Exp.__________

Ass.

Exp.___________

Ass.

Control

E

No intervention

-

No intervention

-

Story reading

√^

Phonological
Control

/

Phonological
repetition

-

Phonological
repetition

-

Story reading

√^

Ostensive
definition

/

Ostensive
definition

E

Ostensive
definition

E

Story reading

E

Lexical
contrast

E

Ostensive
definition

/

Lexical
contrast

E

Story reading

/

Definition

E

Ostensive

definition_______

E

Definition

E

Story reading

/

Exp. = Type of exposure, Ass.= Assessments - = no assessment took place, / = assessment took place

Children were pre-tested on two different measurements: (a) naming task (identifying their
baseline expressive vocabulary knowledge and (b) multiple choice task (identifying their
baseline receptive vocabulary knowledge).The four target words were also pretested during
that screening procedure. To be included in the study children needed to meet the criteria
presented in Table 7.3.

Table 7.3 Criteria met by all the children who took part in Experiment 2

High frequency words

Low frequency words

Naming (production)

Failure (n = 130)

Failure (n=130)

Multiple choice (Comprehension)

Success (n =130)

Failure (n = 130)

This allowed the pattern of acquisition for unknown (low frequency words) and for partially
represented lexical items (high frequency words) to be monitored. The operational definition
in this Experiment of “partially represented” words is evidence of comprehension but not
production, while the operational definition of “unknown words” is no evidence of
comprehension or production.

The children were randomly allocated to one of the five following groups: (a) Control
group, (b) Phonological control group, (c ) Ostensive definition group, (d) Lexical contrast
group and (e) Definition group. For the purposes of the present Experiment, the first two
groups are called the
Control groups, while the last three are called the Experimental groups.

188



More intriguing information

1. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
2. Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes
3. The name is absent
4. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
5. Computational Experiments with the Fuzzy Love and Romance
6. O funcionalismo de Sellars: uma pesquisa histδrica
7. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test
8. Fertility in Developing Countries
9. The name is absent
10. The Advantage of Cooperatives under Asymmetric Cost Information
11. The name is absent
12. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
13. The name is absent
14. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities
15. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
16. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
17. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
18. LOCAL CONTROL AND IMPROVEMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE
19. Importing Feminist Criticism
20. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015