NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION



significantly better than the Ostensive definition group (Wilcoxon: Z=2.7, p<.05). During
post test 3, the Definition group performed significantly better than the Control (Wilcoxon:
Z=3.2, p<.005) the Phonological control(Wilcoxon: Z=3.03, p<.005) and the Ostensive
definition group (Wilcoxon: Z=2.8, p<.005). The Lexical contrast group performed
significantly better than the Control group (Wilcoxon: Z=2.1, p<.05). Diagram 7.2 presents
the significant differences between the groups.

Diagram 7.2 Significant group differences in the multiple choice task across testing

Abbreviations: Phono-Co=Phonological control; Ostdefin=Ostensive definition; Lex. contr. Lexical contrast

Does children ,s performance on the Multiple choice task improve with increased exposure
to the lexical items?

No significant differences were found over time.

Does the children ,s prior knowledge of the lexical items influence performance on the
multiple choice task ?

Figure 7.5 shows that children’s performance on the multiple choice task did not differ by
their prior knowledge of the lexical items. Statistical analysis revealed no significant
differences.

205



More intriguing information

1. Disentangling the Sources of Pro-social Behavior in the Workplace: A Field Experiment
2. The name is absent
3. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
4. The name is absent
5. Long-Term Capital Movements
6. The name is absent
7. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
8. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
9. Pricing American-style Derivatives under the Heston Model Dynamics: A Fast Fourier Transformation in the Geske–Johnson Scheme
10. The name is absent