NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION



.... I

Does children ,s provision of descriptive properties increase -with increased exposure to the
lexical items?

The number cd “descriptive” properties provided during post test 3 was significantly higher
than in post test 1 (Wilcoxon: Z= 5.4, p<.0000) and post test 2 (Wilcoxon: Z=4.8, p<.0000).
Separate analysis for each group revealed that the Ostensive definition group provided
significantly more
“descriptive” properties in post test 3 than in post test 2 (Wilcoxon:
Z=3.00, p<.005). The Lexical contrast group provided significantly more
“descriptive”
properties in post test 3 than in post test 1 (Wilcoxon: Z=3.9, p<.0005) and post test 2
(Wilcoxon: Z=4.1, p<.0000). The Definition group during post test 2 provided significantly
less
“descriptive” properties in post test 1 than in post test 2 (Wilcoxon: Z=3.2, p<.005) and
post test 3 (Wilcoxon: Z=3.7, p<.0005).

Does the children ,s prior knowledge of the lexical items influence the provision of descriptive
properties?

All the children provided more “descriptive” properties for the partially represented than for
the unknown words. Significant differences were found for post test 2 (Wilcoxon: Z=2.3,
p<.05). Separate analysis for each group revealed the same pattern. Significant differences
were found for the Definition group during post test 2 (Wilcoxon: Z= 2.04, p<.05) and post
test 3 (Wilcoxon: Z=2.03, p<.05).

Is the provision of descriptive properties influenced by the semantic domain of the lexical
items?

The children provided significantly more “descriptive” properties for the words describing
animals than for the words describing artifacts across testing (Wilcoxon, Pl: Z=3.2, p<.005;
P2: Z=2.4, p<.05; P3: Z=2.5, p<.05). Separate analysis for each group demonstrated the same
pattern. Significant differences were found for the Ostensive definition group during post
test 1 (Wilcoxon: Z=2.02, p<.05), the Lexical contrast group during post test 3 (Wilcoxon:
Z=2.02, p<.05) and the Definition group across testing (Wilcoxon, Pl: Z=2.02, p<.05; P2:
Z=2.8, p<.005; P3: Z=2.5, p<.05).

216



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
3. The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (El) in the Workplace.
4. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
5. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
6. he Virtual Playground: an Educational Virtual Reality Environment for Evaluating Interactivity and Conceptual Learning
7. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
8. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
9. Feeling Good about Giving: The Benefits (and Costs) of Self-Interested Charitable Behavior
10. A Rational Analysis of Alternating Search and Reflection Strategies in Problem Solving
11. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
12. The name is absent
13. Plasmid-Encoded Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella typhi and some Enteric Bacteria in and around Kolkata, India: A Preliminary Study
14. THE UNCERTAIN FUTURE OF THE MEXICAN MARKET FOR U.S. COTTON: IMPACT OF THE ELIMINATION OF TEXTILE AND CLOTHING QUOTAS
15. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure
16. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary
17. The migration of unskilled youth: Is there any wage gain?
18. Robust Econometrics
19. Policy Formulation, Implementation and Feedback in EU Merger Control
20. Cryothermal Energy Ablation Of Cardiac Arrhythmias 2005: State Of The Art