(Wilcoxon: Z=7.6, p<.0000 and Z=6.3, p<.0000 respectively). Diagram 7.4 gives a graphical
representation of the previous significant differences between the properties.
Diagram 7.4 Significant group differences among the properties mentioned in the
definit>nnβ «ernes
nsfinσ
Analysis of the Descriptive properties
Is there a differential impact of the type of exposure to new lexical items that the children
receive on the provision of descriptive properties?
No significant differences were found for post test 1. Significant differences were found for
post test 2 (Kruskall-Wallis 1 Way-Anova: X2 = 31.2, df= 2 p<.0005) and post test 3 (X2 =
26.6, df= 4, p<.0000). During post test 2, “descriptive'' properties were used significantly
more by the Definition group than the Ostensive definition (Wilcoxon: Z = 4.1, p<.0005) and
the Lexical contrast group (Wilcoxon: Z =4.4, p<.0005). During post test 3, “descriptive"
properties were used significantly more by the Definition than the Control (Wilcoxon: Z=3.5,
p<.0005) the Phonological control group (Wilcoxon: Z=4.3, p<.0000) and the Ostensive
definition group (Wilcoxon: Z=3.5, p<.0005). In addition, descriptive properties were used
significantly more by the Lexical contrast than the Control (Wilcoxon: Z=3.5, p<.0005) and
Phonological control group (Wilcoxon: Z= 4.3, p<.0000).
215
More intriguing information
1. Fiscal Rules, Fiscal Institutions, and Fiscal Performance2. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
3. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
4. Personal Income Tax Elasticity in Turkey: 1975-2005
5. CHANGING PRICES, CHANGING CIGARETTE CONSUMPTION
6. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
7. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
8. The name is absent
9. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
10. The name is absent