Appendix 7.5
Children’s response pattern (percentages) on the Naming task by group across testing
Control |
Phonol. control |
Ostensive definition |
Lexical contrast |
Definition | |||||||
І 2 |
3 |
1 |
2 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 3 |
Dk |
2<λ8 |
183 |
29.8 |
22.1 |
9.6 |
2k8 |
21.1 |
^Kλ6 |
25 |
5.8 3.8 | |
Irr. |
1.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.0 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- - | |
Pho. |
3.8 |
3.8 |
7.7 |
5.8 |
9.6 |
5.8 |
8.6 |
4.8 |
7.7 |
9.6 3.8 | |
Basic |
31.7 |
25 |
20.2 |
25 |
17.3 |
14.4 |
10.6 |
15.4 |
14.4 |
12.5 1.5 | |
Supe∕te |
1.0 |
1.9 |
- |
9.6 |
10.6 |
- |
- |
1.0 |
- |
0.1 0.1 | |
Subo∕te |
1.9 |
1.0 |
- |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- 0.1 | |
Funct. |
1.0 |
1.9 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- - | |
Context. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- - | |
Percep. |
- |
- |
1.9 |
- |
- |
- |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- - | |
Inno. |
1.9 |
0.1 |
4.8 |
- |
1.0 |
- |
1.0 |
1.0 |
- |
- - | |
Target |
26.9 |
47.1 |
34.6 |
36.5 |
50.1 |
49.03 |
56.7 |
67.3 |
52.9 71.1 78.8 | ||
N of responses |
Ї04 |
І04 |
104 |
104 |
104 |
104 |
104 |
Tθ4 |
104104 |
104 |
Abbreviations: Dk = don’t know responses, Irr= irrelevant responses, Pho.= phonological error responses, Basic= basic level responses, Supe∕te = superordinate level responses, Subo∕te=
subordinate level responses, Funct.- functional responses, Context.= contextual responses, Percept.= perceptual responses, Inno = innovative words, Target= target word responses; 1= Post
test 1; 2 = Post test 2; 3 = Post test 3
389
More intriguing information
1. Delayed Manifestation of T ransurethral Syndrome as a Complication of T ransurethral Prostatic Resection2. Imitation in location choice
3. Antidote Stocking at Hospitals in North Palestine
4. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
5. The Triangular Relationship between the Commission, NRAs and National Courts Revisited
6. Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints and Off-Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain for Green Program on Rural Households in China
7. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkul des naturlichen Schlieβens nebst Metatheorie
8. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
9. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
10. Evidence of coevolution in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms