Appendix 7.5
Children’s response pattern (percentages) on the Naming task by group across testing
|
Control |
Phonol. control |
Ostensive definition |
Lexical contrast |
Definition | |||||||
|
І 2 |
3 |
1 |
2 3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 3 |
|
Dk |
2<λ8 |
183 |
29.8 |
22.1 |
9.6 |
2k8 |
21.1 |
^Kλ6 |
25 |
5.8 3.8 | |
|
Irr. |
1.9 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
1.0 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- - | |
|
Pho. |
3.8 |
3.8 |
7.7 |
5.8 |
9.6 |
5.8 |
8.6 |
4.8 |
7.7 |
9.6 3.8 | |
|
Basic |
31.7 |
25 |
20.2 |
25 |
17.3 |
14.4 |
10.6 |
15.4 |
14.4 |
12.5 1.5 | |
|
Supe∕te |
1.0 |
1.9 |
- |
9.6 |
10.6 |
- |
- |
1.0 |
- |
0.1 0.1 | |
|
Subo∕te |
1.9 |
1.0 |
- |
1.0 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- 0.1 | |
|
Funct. |
1.0 |
1.9 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- - | |
|
Context. |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- - | |
|
Percep. |
- |
- |
1.9 |
- |
- |
- |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- - | |
|
Inno. |
1.9 |
0.1 |
4.8 |
- |
1.0 |
- |
1.0 |
1.0 |
- |
- - | |
|
Target |
26.9 |
47.1 |
34.6 |
36.5 |
50.1 |
49.03 |
56.7 |
67.3 |
52.9 71.1 78.8 | ||
|
N of responses |
Ї04 |
І04 |
104 |
104 |
104 |
104 |
104 |
Tθ4 |
104104 |
104 | |
Abbreviations: Dk = don’t know responses, Irr= irrelevant responses, Pho.= phonological error responses, Basic= basic level responses, Supe∕te = superordinate level responses, Subo∕te=
subordinate level responses, Funct.- functional responses, Context.= contextual responses, Percept.= perceptual responses, Inno = innovative words, Target= target word responses; 1= Post
test 1; 2 = Post test 2; 3 = Post test 3
389
More intriguing information
1. Migrant Business Networks and FDI2. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
3. Skills, Partnerships and Tenancy in Sri Lankan Rice Farms
4. Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom
5. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
6. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
7. The name is absent
8. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
9. The name is absent
10. The Role of State Trading Enterprises and Their Impact on Agricultural Development and Economic Growth in Developing Countries