Table 2: Sizes and local powers of tests of the cointegration rank
|
(a) Empirical sizes | ||||
|
Я = |
10 |
Я = |
20 | |
|
T |
REG |
LLL |
REG |
LLL |
|
20 |
0.012 |
0.000 |
0.010 |
0.000 |
|
30 |
0.033 |
0.000 |
0.033 |
0.000 |
|
50 |
0.053 |
0.004 |
0.050 |
0.002 |
|
100 |
0.056 |
0.030 |
0.068 |
0.033 |
|
(b) Local powers (size adjusted) | ||||
|
Я = |
10 |
Я = |
20 | |
|
T |
REG |
LLL |
REG |
LLL |
|
20 |
0.242 |
0.150 |
0.240 |
0.143 |
|
30 |
0.221 |
0.150 |
0.227 |
0.148 |
|
50 |
0.186 |
0.141 |
0.206 |
0.153 |
|
100 |
0.164 |
0.146 |
0.169 |
0.166 |
Note: Rejection frequency for tests of the null hypothesis r = 1. “REG” indi-
cates the regression based test suggested in Theorem 2 and “LLL” denotes the
LR-bar statistic suggested by Lyhagen et al. (2001). The local power is com-
puted by simulating the data under the local alternative VNT = —10/ (T∖N).
The critical values are used that yield tests with an exact size of 0.05 under the
null hypothesis (size adjusted power). 5000 replications are used to compute
the rejection frequencies.
23
More intriguing information
1. Moffett and rhetoric2. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
3. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries
4. KNOWLEDGE EVOLUTION
5. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
6. A Computational Model of Children's Semantic Memory
7. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
8. A Rare Case Of Fallopian Tube Cancer
9. The name is absent
10. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole