Table 1: Estimation bias of various cointegration estimators
|
Bias | ||||
|
two-stage |
FM-OLS |
DOLS |
OLS | |
|
T = |
N |
10 | ||
|
15 |
-0.1363 |
-0.4280 |
-0.4294 |
-0.4824 |
|
15 |
-0.1304 |
-0.6487 |
-0.6487 |
-0.7476 |
|
20 |
-0.0900 |
-0.5675 |
-0.5675 |
-0.6811 |
|
30 |
-0.0300 |
-0.4578 |
-0.4578 |
-0.5759 |
|
50 |
0.0124 |
-0.3233 |
-0.3233 |
-0.4390 |
|
100 |
0.0233 |
-0.1842 |
-0.1842 |
-0.2732 |
|
T = |
N= |
20 | ||
|
15 |
-0.1316 |
-0.6439 |
-0.6439 |
-0.7524 |
|
20 |
-0.0884 |
-0.5654 |
-0.5654 |
-0.6832 |
|
30 |
-0.0327 |
-0.4515 |
-0.4515 |
-0.5752 |
|
50 |
0.0091 |
-0.3158 |
-0.3158 |
-0.4362 |
|
100 |
0.0198 |
-0.1766 |
-0.1766 |
-0.2688 |
|
__________________RMSE__________________ | ||||
|
two-stage |
FM-OLS |
DOLS |
OLS | |
|
T = |
N= |
10 | ||
|
15 |
0.2100 |
0.6806 |
0.6806 |
0.7651 |
|
20 |
0.1723 |
0.5999 |
0.5999 |
0.6983 |
|
30 |
0.1227 |
0.4874 |
0.4874 |
0.5926 |
|
50 |
0.0883 |
0.3485 |
0.3485 |
0.4541 |
|
100 |
0.0650 |
0.2016 |
0.2016 |
0.2849 |
|
T = |
N = |
20 | ||
|
15 |
0.1746 |
0.6604 |
0.6604 |
0.7611 |
|
20 |
0.1355 |
0.5813 |
0.5813 |
0.6921 |
|
30 |
0.0909 |
0.4664 |
0.4664 |
0.5840 |
|
50 |
0.0633 |
0.3284 |
0.3284 |
0.4438 |
|
100 |
0.0461 |
0.1851 |
0.1851 |
0.2749 |
Note: The entries of the Table report the estimated bias and root mean
squared error (RMSE) of the cointegration parameter b based on 5000 replica-
tion of the model (16). “two-step” indicates the two-step estimator suggested
in Section 3, “FM-OLS” denotes the Fully-modified panel cointegration esti-
mator suggested by Pedroni (1996), “DOLS” is the dynamic OLS estimator of
Kao and Chiang (2000), and “OLS” indicates the ordinary least-squares esti-
mator of the pooled model, where the first variable is regressed on the second
variable.
22
More intriguing information
1. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles2. The name is absent
3. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN FARMERS IN AFRICA: LESSONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; WITH AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
4. CAPACITAÇÃO GERENCIAL DE AGRICULTORES FAMILIARES: UMA PROPOSTA METODOLÓGICA DE EXTENSÃO RURAL
5. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
6. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
7. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
8. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent