Table 1: Estimation bias of various cointegration estimators
|
Bias | ||||
|
two-stage |
FM-OLS |
DOLS |
OLS | |
|
T = |
N |
10 | ||
|
15 |
-0.1363 |
-0.4280 |
-0.4294 |
-0.4824 |
|
15 |
-0.1304 |
-0.6487 |
-0.6487 |
-0.7476 |
|
20 |
-0.0900 |
-0.5675 |
-0.5675 |
-0.6811 |
|
30 |
-0.0300 |
-0.4578 |
-0.4578 |
-0.5759 |
|
50 |
0.0124 |
-0.3233 |
-0.3233 |
-0.4390 |
|
100 |
0.0233 |
-0.1842 |
-0.1842 |
-0.2732 |
|
T = |
N= |
20 | ||
|
15 |
-0.1316 |
-0.6439 |
-0.6439 |
-0.7524 |
|
20 |
-0.0884 |
-0.5654 |
-0.5654 |
-0.6832 |
|
30 |
-0.0327 |
-0.4515 |
-0.4515 |
-0.5752 |
|
50 |
0.0091 |
-0.3158 |
-0.3158 |
-0.4362 |
|
100 |
0.0198 |
-0.1766 |
-0.1766 |
-0.2688 |
|
__________________RMSE__________________ | ||||
|
two-stage |
FM-OLS |
DOLS |
OLS | |
|
T = |
N= |
10 | ||
|
15 |
0.2100 |
0.6806 |
0.6806 |
0.7651 |
|
20 |
0.1723 |
0.5999 |
0.5999 |
0.6983 |
|
30 |
0.1227 |
0.4874 |
0.4874 |
0.5926 |
|
50 |
0.0883 |
0.3485 |
0.3485 |
0.4541 |
|
100 |
0.0650 |
0.2016 |
0.2016 |
0.2849 |
|
T = |
N = |
20 | ||
|
15 |
0.1746 |
0.6604 |
0.6604 |
0.7611 |
|
20 |
0.1355 |
0.5813 |
0.5813 |
0.6921 |
|
30 |
0.0909 |
0.4664 |
0.4664 |
0.5840 |
|
50 |
0.0633 |
0.3284 |
0.3284 |
0.4438 |
|
100 |
0.0461 |
0.1851 |
0.1851 |
0.2749 |
Note: The entries of the Table report the estimated bias and root mean
squared error (RMSE) of the cointegration parameter b based on 5000 replica-
tion of the model (16). “two-step” indicates the two-step estimator suggested
in Section 3, “FM-OLS” denotes the Fully-modified panel cointegration esti-
mator suggested by Pedroni (1996), “DOLS” is the dynamic OLS estimator of
Kao and Chiang (2000), and “OLS” indicates the ordinary least-squares esti-
mator of the pooled model, where the first variable is regressed on the second
variable.
22
More intriguing information
1. Fiscal Reform and Monetary Union in West Africa2. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY
3. IMPACTS OF EPA DAIRY WASTE REGULATIONS ON FARM PROFITABILITY
4. Database Search Strategies for Proteomic Data Sets Generated by Electron Capture Dissociation Mass Spectrometry
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring and Investment in Pollution Abatement
8. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration
9. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
10. Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers