Table 1: Estimation bias of various cointegration estimators
|
Bias | ||||
|
two-stage |
FM-OLS |
DOLS |
OLS | |
|
T = |
N |
10 | ||
|
15 |
-0.1363 |
-0.4280 |
-0.4294 |
-0.4824 |
|
15 |
-0.1304 |
-0.6487 |
-0.6487 |
-0.7476 |
|
20 |
-0.0900 |
-0.5675 |
-0.5675 |
-0.6811 |
|
30 |
-0.0300 |
-0.4578 |
-0.4578 |
-0.5759 |
|
50 |
0.0124 |
-0.3233 |
-0.3233 |
-0.4390 |
|
100 |
0.0233 |
-0.1842 |
-0.1842 |
-0.2732 |
|
T = |
N= |
20 | ||
|
15 |
-0.1316 |
-0.6439 |
-0.6439 |
-0.7524 |
|
20 |
-0.0884 |
-0.5654 |
-0.5654 |
-0.6832 |
|
30 |
-0.0327 |
-0.4515 |
-0.4515 |
-0.5752 |
|
50 |
0.0091 |
-0.3158 |
-0.3158 |
-0.4362 |
|
100 |
0.0198 |
-0.1766 |
-0.1766 |
-0.2688 |
|
__________________RMSE__________________ | ||||
|
two-stage |
FM-OLS |
DOLS |
OLS | |
|
T = |
N= |
10 | ||
|
15 |
0.2100 |
0.6806 |
0.6806 |
0.7651 |
|
20 |
0.1723 |
0.5999 |
0.5999 |
0.6983 |
|
30 |
0.1227 |
0.4874 |
0.4874 |
0.5926 |
|
50 |
0.0883 |
0.3485 |
0.3485 |
0.4541 |
|
100 |
0.0650 |
0.2016 |
0.2016 |
0.2849 |
|
T = |
N = |
20 | ||
|
15 |
0.1746 |
0.6604 |
0.6604 |
0.7611 |
|
20 |
0.1355 |
0.5813 |
0.5813 |
0.6921 |
|
30 |
0.0909 |
0.4664 |
0.4664 |
0.5840 |
|
50 |
0.0633 |
0.3284 |
0.3284 |
0.4438 |
|
100 |
0.0461 |
0.1851 |
0.1851 |
0.2749 |
Note: The entries of the Table report the estimated bias and root mean
squared error (RMSE) of the cointegration parameter b based on 5000 replica-
tion of the model (16). “two-step” indicates the two-step estimator suggested
in Section 3, “FM-OLS” denotes the Fully-modified panel cointegration esti-
mator suggested by Pedroni (1996), “DOLS” is the dynamic OLS estimator of
Kao and Chiang (2000), and “OLS” indicates the ordinary least-squares esti-
mator of the pooled model, where the first variable is regressed on the second
variable.
22
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Modelling Transport in an Interregional General Equilibrium Model with Externalities
3. The technological mediation of mathematics and its learning
4. The name is absent
5. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
6. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
7. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
8. Cross-Country Evidence on the Link between the Level of Infrastructure and Capital Inflows
9. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
10. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994