Table 3. Between-group correlations and retained factors
|
ADF |
ARDL | |||||||
|
Panel |
r |
γ |
λLR |
τ |
r |
γ |
λLR |
τ |
|
CPI-DM |
.265 |
8.641 |
1956 |
3 |
.274 |
8.288 |
2023 |
3 |
|
[.000] |
[.000] | |||||||
|
CPI-US$ |
.645 |
24.85 |
7274 |
1 |
.651 |
19.75 |
7059 |
1 |
|
[.000] |
[.000] | |||||||
|
WPI-DM |
.272 |
7.836 |
1550 |
2 |
.275 |
7.419 |
1544 |
2 |
|
[.000] |
[.000] | |||||||
|
WPI-US$ |
.619 |
19.60 |
4859 |
1 |
.613 |
17.70 |
4869 |
1 |
|
[.000] |
[.000] | |||||||
Note: r is the average cross-section correlation, γ = (λmax )1/2 is the condition
λmin
number, λLR is the p -value of Breusch-Pagan diagonality test on the residual
correlation matrix and τ is the number of factors retained by Kaiser criterion. All
of these are computed from the equation-by-equation OLS residuals.
25
More intriguing information
1. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems2. ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.
3. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
4. Quality practices, priorities and performance: an international study
5. Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows
6. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
7. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
8. The name is absent
9. ISSUES AND PROBLEMS OF IMMEDIATE CONCERN
10. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement