are inferior to the urban transport, moreover in the first case demand is shown more
sensitive to changes in price than in time and for this the restricted measurements to use the
car could help to a more balanced modal distribution. Demand for urban transport, is shown
more sensitive as in a variation in price as in time what shows that a politic that followed a
reduction of congestion in Cadiz must not forget a reestructuration of urban transport that
looked at smaller times for displacements and a politic of proper prices to get an effective
movement of users between ways. The biggest elasticities obtained for urban transport in
Cadiz in comparisson with other studies induce us to think that in this city there is
nowadays a big control margin to act over the variables that determine the modal choice.
References
Amemiya, T. (1981): “Qualitative Response Models” Journal of Economic Literature. Vol.
XIX , pags. 1483-1536.
EPYPSA (1993): Movilidad en dιa laborable en la Baha de Cadiz. MOPTMA y Junta de
Andaluda.
Gallastegui, I. (1985): “Aspectos basicos de los modelos de elecciôn discreta en econom^a”.
Revista Espanola de Economia, vol. 2, n° 2, pags 187-202.
Gonzalez, R. M. et al (1995): “Modelos logit y probit binomiales. La estimaciôn del valor
del tiempo en la lmea Gran Canaria-Tenerife”. V Congreso Nacional de Econom^a. Las
Palmas de Gran Canaria.
MacFadden, D. (1974): “The Measurement of Urban Travel Demand”, Journal of Public
Economics. Vol. 3, n° 4, pags 303-328.
MacFadden, D. (1981): “Econometric Models of Probabilistic Choice”, en Structural
Analysis of Discrete Data. Manski, C. F. y MacFadden, D. eds..Cambrige: MIT Press, pags.
198-272.
Matas, A. (1990): El transporte urbano: analisis de la eficiencia y factores condicionantes
de la demanda. Tesis Doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Econômicas y Empresariales,
Bellaterra, Barcelona.